Understand Kirchhoff's Rules: Solving Circuit Confusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter sap_54
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rules
AI Thread Summary
Understanding Kirchhoff's rules can be challenging, especially when determining current flow in complex circuits. It is recommended to use the branch current method, assigning each branch its own distinct current to simplify analysis. Current changes occur primarily at junctions where elements are in parallel, as they share start and end nodes. Visualizing current as water flowing through pipes can help clarify how it splits at forks in the circuit. Properly labeling nodes and assigning currents from one node to another is essential for accurate circuit analysis.
sap_54
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I understand (or at least thought I did) :D Kirchhoff's rules. When I got to this circuit; however, I got a wee bit confused. The arrows indicate where I placed my three arbitrary currents. When writing equations for the two smaller loops (the ones on the left), I didn't know which current to use for the middle portion (in red). Should I add another current here?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
I recommend that you use the branch current method to solve these kinds of problems: Assign each distinct branch its own current. (In this circuit, I see 6 branches.)
 
When does current change?
A good way to think of current is as water flowing through a pipe. Think of the voltage source as a faucet pumping out water. So what would happen if you had a pipe that forked? The water would reach it and the water would split, a portion going one way and another portion going the other.

A more mechanical way of thinking of it is. Current changes when you have elements in parallel. What is the definition of parallel?
A loose definition is when two elements share start/end nodes.

So if you label all your nodes {A,B,C,...} and then arbitrarily assign a current from node A to B, A to C, ... then you will get your answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top