Understanding Branch Cuts for Analytic Functions in the Complex Plane

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 6K views
hoffmann
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
I have a question with regards to branch cuts:

Say I have a function f(z) = log(z2 - 1). Why is a simple branch cut connecting z = -1 and z = +1 not sufficient to define an analytic function? On the other hand, why is it sufficient for the function f(z) = (z^2 - 1)^(1/2) ?

This is in the complex plane where z = a + ib.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hoffmann said:
I have a question with regards to branch cuts:

Say I have a function f(z) = log(z2 - 1). Why is a simple branch cut connecting z = -1 and z = +1 not sufficient to define an analytic function? On the other hand, why is it sufficient for the function f(z) = (z^2 - 1)^(1/2) ?

This is in the complex plane where z = a + ib.

perhaps the point at infinity?
 
^^ what do you mean by this?
 
hoffmann said:
^^ what do you mean by this?

Don't worry about.

How about just trying to write
[tex] z=1+r_1e^{i\theta_1}[/tex]
and
[tex] z=-1+r_2e^{i\theta_2}[/tex]
and investigate how the function
[tex] \log(z^2-1)=\log(z-1)+\log(z+1)=\log(r_1r_2)+i(\theta_1+\theta_2)[/tex]
behaves as you go around the perspective "branch cut" that you mentioned... try it.