Understanding Centripetal Forces on a Rotating Bead Hoop

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Loro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bead Rotating
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dynamics of a bead confined on a rotating circular hoop, analyzing the forces acting on it, including Coriolis, centrifugal, and centripetal forces. The participants clarify that the reaction force from the hoop must balance the Coriolis force and provide the necessary centripetal force for the bead's motion. The equations derived indicate that the total force in the radial direction is the sum of the centrifugal force and the reaction force, equating to the centripetal acceleration multiplied by the mass of the bead. This understanding is crucial for accurately modeling the motion of the bead on the hoop.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational dynamics
  • Familiarity with Coriolis and centrifugal forces
  • Knowledge of centripetal acceleration concepts
  • Basic proficiency in Newton's laws of motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of forces in rotating reference frames
  • Explore applications of Coriolis force in real-world scenarios
  • Learn about the dynamics of particles on curved paths
  • Investigate the implications of friction in rotating systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of rotational motion and dynamics.

Loro
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
We have a bead confined on a circular hoop. The hoop is rotating around an axis tangential to it. Suppose the bead is intially at the point, farthest away from the axis, and has got some intial velocity.

I have a question - in the frame of the hoop, there is a Coriolis force perpendicular to the plane of the hoop, and a balancing reaction force. Then there is a centrifugal force, which has got a component normal to the hoop.

How big is the force from the hoop, balancing this one? Is it of the same magnitude as this normal component, or is it bigger so that it provides a net centripetal force associated with the motion of the bead around the hoop?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Loro! :smile:
Loro said:
We have a bead confined on a circular hoop. The hoop is rotating around an axis tangential to it. Suppose the bead is intially at the point, farthest away from the axis, and has got some intial velocity.

If I'm understanding it correctly, the initial relative velocity (which is tangential) is parallel to the axis of rotation, so the initial Coriolis force is zero. :confused:
 
Yes, that's what I mean. Sorry that I didn't make a picture.
 
I'm not sure what you're asking.

In the frame of the hoop, there's a centrifugal force away from the axis, there's a Coriolis force "vertically" out of the plane of the hoop, there's a centripetal acceleration towards the centre of the hoop, and there's a tangential acceleration …

when you put them all together, what equations did you get? :smile:
 
So if I were to compute the reaction forces of the hoop, there would be:

- one "vertically" out - balancing the Coriolis force
- and one towards the centre of the hoop

But would the latter be equal in magnitude to the component of the centrifugal force, normal to the loop? Or would it be that, + the centripetal force?
 
Loro said:
So if I were to compute the reaction forces of the hoop, there would be:

- one "vertically" out - balancing the Coriolis force
- and one towards the centre of the hoop

Yes, the reaction force (for a frictionless hoop) must be perpendicular to the tangent, so it will have a "vertical" component and a radial component.
But would the latter be equal in magnitude to the component of the centrifugal force, normal to the loop? Or would it be that, + the centripetal force?

Ftotal = ma …

Ftotal is the centrifugal force plus the reaction force

a is the centripetal acceleration plus the tangential acceleration

So, in the radial direction, the component of the centrifugal force plus the component of the reaction force must equal the centripetal acceleration times the mass.
 
Thanks, that answers my question! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
781
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
15K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K