Understanding Continuous Space, Spectra, and Planck Units in Quantum Spacetime

  • Thread starter Thread starter denisv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous
denisv
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
How are continuous space and continuous spectra of operators mathematically consistent with Planck units?

Shouldn't the quantum spacetime be a lattice (or what have you) of integer multiples of the Planck length?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably.
In ordinary QM treating spacetime as continuous has the distinct advantage that the wavefunction is a differentiable function. The level at which this is an approximation is really, really small, much smaller than the levels at which one uses ordinary QM. If you're probing those kind of distance scales you probably at least want to be using QFT anyway, if not BSM (beyond the standard model) physics; nobody claims that QM alone is a complete and accurate description of nature (or if they do, they're wrong).
Afraid I can't tell you much about anything more advanced than QM though (soon ... :biggrin: once I've done these exams :( ) Perhaps someone else on here can help. If not, try the dedicated BSM forum.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top