Understanding Coulombic Operator: J Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter greisen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the Coulombic operator represented by the equation J = ∫ dτ φ(2) (1/r_{12}) φ(2). Participants clarify that dτ is the differential volume element, specifically in spherical coordinates as r^2 dr dΩ. The integration involves two wave functions representing electrons, and the expectation of the Coulombic interaction operator is questioned. It is suggested that the 1/r term in J should be expressed as a function of r1 - r2, complicating the integration in three dimensions. The problem is recommended to be approached computationally for better clarity and accuracy.
greisen
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to understand this equation where the coulombic operator is given by

J = \int d\tau \phi(2) \frac{1}{r_{12}}\phi(2)

so I integrate over \tau but what is tau and the number I get from the equation is the energy I pressume?
Any hints or help appreciated.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
d\tau just represents the differential volume element.
In spherical coordinates, it is r^2 dr d\Omega.
 
what is that more exactly? I know from spherical geometry that the volume is calculate
dV = \rho^2 sin \phi d\phi d\rho d\theta

If I integrate over two wave functions representing two electrons how to interpreted it?

Any help or advice appreciated

Thanks in advance
 
Are you trying to integrate the expectation of the coulombic interaction operator over two wavefunctions? <a(r1)|J|b(r2)> ? (with r1, r2 position vectors so in general dependent on r, theta and phi).

If so, which wavefunctions a and b are you using? You'd also need to rexpress the 1/r term in J as some function r1-r2, which will be fairly complicated in 3D. I'd guess this problem is best solved computationally...
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top