Understanding Counterterms: Demystifying Srednicki's Equation 9.25

  • Thread starter Thread starter malawi_glenn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Srednicki
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Messages
6,735
Reaction score
2,431
Hi, I was wonder what mr. Srednicki is meaning on page 68 (page 82 in his pre-print), where he writes that "Eq. 9.25" results in a new vertex where two lines meet" Now I have a hard time to figure it out how it would look like diagrammatically and was wondering if anyone had a more hands-on example?

cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The corresponding diagram is the second one in figure 14.1.
 
Thanx mate!

I have a hard time to appreciate Srednicki, the reviews on Amazon is very good. But I think that sometimes, it the worst textbook I have read. So I have this hate-love relation to him. Same with Peskins book... but in the end, I think Peskin and Srednicki complements each other very well.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top