Understanding Einstein's Theory of Relativity

  • Thread starter Thread starter ppr2010
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused E=mc2
ppr2010
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm not really a physics genius or professor so forgive my lack of knowledge.
I was thinking about Einstein's theory of relativity earlier,then it just popped into my head doesn't that contradict The Law of Conservation of Charge?Ex:111grams of hydrogen = 10,000,000,000,000,000 Joules.but in order to achieve that amount it will have to be completely destroyed.

I thought matter and energy cannot be destroyed.Is it just converted and what i had read was misleading and inaccurate.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mass and energy are not separately conserved in relativity. What is conserved is mass-energy, which is found by adding up all the mass and all the energy (after using E=mc^2 to convert them both into the same units). Conservation of charge is a separate issue. Charge is conserved. For example, when an electron and an antielectron annihilate one other, the total initial charge is zero, and the total final charge is also zero.
 
Yes the first time you are exposed to conservation law in school it is typically simplified.
 
I thought matter and energy cannot be destroyed.Is it just converted and what i had read was misleading and inaccurate.

I wondered how Wikipedia explained mass and energy and found this:

Mass also cannot be created or destroyed, and in all of its forms, has energy. According to the theory of relativity, mass and energy as commonly understood, are two names for the same thing, and neither one is changed or transformed into the other. Rather, neither one appears without the other. Rather than mass being changed into energy, the view of relativity is that rest mass has been changed to a more mobile form of mass, but remains mass. In this process, neither the amount of mass nor the amount of energy changes. Thus, if energy changes type and leaves a system, it simply takes its mass with it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass-energy_equivalence#Conservation_of_mass_and_energy
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top