Understanding Electric Field of Positive & Negative Plates

Click For Summary
The confusion arises from the calculation of the electric field due to positive and negative plates. The electric field from a single plate is given by E = σ/(2ε₀), not σ/ε₀. When considering both plates, the total electric field is indeed the sum of the contributions from each plate, resulting in E = σ/ε₀. Using a pillbox Gaussian surface helps clarify this concept. Understanding these principles resolves the initial confusion regarding the electric field's magnitude.
annamal
Messages
393
Reaction score
33
Homework Statement
Two large conducting plates carry equal and opposite charges, with a surface charge density as shown in image. The separation between the plates is d. What is the
electric field between the plates?
Relevant Equations
##\vec E = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}##
I am confused with the solution. It says ##\vec E = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}##. Shouldn't E = ##2*\vec E = 2*\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}##? Electric field of the positive plate and electric field of the negative plate.

Screen Shot 2022-04-25 at 11.02.53 PM.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
annamal said:
I am confused with the solution. It says ##\vec E = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}##. Shouldn't E = ##2*\vec E = 2*\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}##?
It should not. Use a pillbox Gaussian surface with one flat face inside the conductor and the other flat face in the vacuum to see why and become unconfused.
 
Well if you mean that the total E-field should be double of that of the one plate, yes that is true but the field of one plate is ##E=\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}##. So the total field is $$2\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}=\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}$$
 
  • Like
Likes Orodruin and annamal
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
924
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K