Understanding Electric Field of Positive & Negative Plates

AI Thread Summary
The confusion arises from the calculation of the electric field due to positive and negative plates. The electric field from a single plate is given by E = σ/(2ε₀), not σ/ε₀. When considering both plates, the total electric field is indeed the sum of the contributions from each plate, resulting in E = σ/ε₀. Using a pillbox Gaussian surface helps clarify this concept. Understanding these principles resolves the initial confusion regarding the electric field's magnitude.
annamal
Messages
393
Reaction score
33
Homework Statement
Two large conducting plates carry equal and opposite charges, with a surface charge density as shown in image. The separation between the plates is d. What is the
electric field between the plates?
Relevant Equations
##\vec E = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}##
I am confused with the solution. It says ##\vec E = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}##. Shouldn't E = ##2*\vec E = 2*\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}##? Electric field of the positive plate and electric field of the negative plate.

Screen Shot 2022-04-25 at 11.02.53 PM.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
annamal said:
I am confused with the solution. It says ##\vec E = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}##. Shouldn't E = ##2*\vec E = 2*\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}##?
It should not. Use a pillbox Gaussian surface with one flat face inside the conductor and the other flat face in the vacuum to see why and become unconfused.
 
Well if you mean that the total E-field should be double of that of the one plate, yes that is true but the field of one plate is ##E=\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}##. So the total field is $$2\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}=\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}$$
 
  • Like
Likes Orodruin and annamal
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top