Understanding Electric Polarization in Dielectric Capacitors

AI Thread Summary
Electric polarization density in a dielectric capacitor aligns in the opposite direction to the applied electric field due to the displacement of electrons from their equilibrium positions. The induced polarization can be expressed as P = χ_el E, applicable for homogeneous isotropic media under static electric fields. For time-dependent fields, the relationship holds in the frequency domain, where polarization is determined by a convolution integral involving susceptibility and the electric field. The causality constraint links susceptibility to a retarded Green's function, and in the frequency domain, the polarization is represented as a function of frequency. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing dielectric behavior in capacitors.
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
Does the electric polarization density of a dielectric inside a capacitor have the same direction as the electrical field? Considering the electric dipole moment vector goes from the - charge to + charge?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, because the electrons in the dielectric are dragged a bit out of their equilibrium positions due to the applied electric field in the opposite direction than the field, because the force is \vec{F}=-e \vec{E}, where -e<0 is the electron's charge. The net effect (in lineare-response approximation) is an induced polarization
\vec{P}=\chi_{\text{el}} \vec{E}. This is for homogeneous isotrophic media and time-independent (static) electric fields.

For time-dependent fields, this relation holds in the frequency domain, i.e., you have
\vec{P}(t,\vec{x})=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} t' \chi_{\text{el}}(t-t') \vec{E}(t',\vec{x}).
The causality constraint, \chi_{\text{el}}(t-t') \propto \Theta(t-t') makes the susceptibility to a retarded Green's function. In the frequency domain, i.e., for the Fourier transform of the quantities the above convolution integral translates into
\tilde{\vec{P}}(\omega,\vec{x})=\tilde{\chi}_{\text{el}}(\omega) \tilde{\vec{E}}(\omega,\vec{x}).
The retardation condition makes \tilde{\chi}(\omega) a holomorphic function in the upper complex \omega-half plane, where use the usual physicist's convention for Fourier transforms between the time and frequency domain:
f(t)=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \frac{\mathrm{d} \omega}{2\pi} \tilde{f}(\omega) \exp(-\mathrm{i} \omega t).
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top