Understanding Entanglement and Parallel Computing in Quantum Computing

KrevinL
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm a bit confused about entanglement with regards to quantum computing. I'm not an expert by any means, but I've been reading around about quantum computing and was confused about something.

I've read that, you can't directly observe a qubit, because if you do the wave function will collapse and it will be no better than a classical bit, so experimenters are using entanglement to get information about other qubits, enabling them to do parallel computing on a single qubit. However I'm failing to see how a qubit can still perform parallel computing, if once one qubits state is observed, both entangled qubits wave functions collapse. So I'm thinking that entanglement just gets you 2 classical bits, with the effort of only measuring one.

Can anyone tell me how this enables parallel computing within a single qubit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Also, how is a quantum computer set up to perform a calculation like integer factorization? I think it has something to do with initializing a qubit with some wave function, but I'm not sure how this end up calculating anything.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top