Understanding Entropy: Order vs Disorder

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter danihel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disorder
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of entropy, particularly its interpretation as order versus disorder. Participants explore the implications of entropy in statistical mechanics, its definitions, and its manifestations in physical systems, while also grappling with the philosophical aspects of order and disorder.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the common interpretation of entropy as disorder, suggesting that "order" is subjective and varies based on personal or cultural perspectives.
  • Another participant explains that in statistical mechanics, entropy is related to the number of microstates corresponding to a macrostate, indicating that systems tend to evolve towards higher entropy due to the greater number of disordered configurations.
  • A participant proposes that entropy could be viewed as a measure of the probability of a particular state of a system, suggesting that the universe started in a highly improbable state and is moving towards a more probable state over time.
  • There is a discussion about the definition of entropy in classical mechanics, highlighting that low entropy states are considered "ordered" and high entropy states "disordered," while also noting that homogeneity can exist in both high and low entropy states.
  • Examples are provided to illustrate the relationship between homogeneity and entropy, such as rolling dice and mixing paint, to clarify that homogeneity does not necessarily equate to low entropy.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about understanding the mathematical definition of entropy and seeks confirmation on their interpretation of the concept.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of order and disorder in relation to entropy, with no consensus reached on the philosophical implications. While some technical aspects are clarified, the broader conceptual understanding remains contested.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of defining order and disorder, and the discussion includes various interpretations and examples that highlight the nuanced nature of entropy. There are unresolved aspects regarding the philosophical implications of these definitions.

danihel
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm sorry and hope this forum allows people who don't study but are interested in physics to post their primitive questions:
I like watching documentaries and in every documentary on physics that i watched when it came to entropy, it was simply described as disorder as if that was a thing.
Is it only me being retarded? I mean, to me- "order" is a word that points to just anybody's personal preference of organization of things in any sort of dimension (being it space/time, alphabet or numbering system...) based on his current practical needs or cultural bias. Maybe Jackson Pollock had different concept of order than Rothko. Is an English garden of higher entropy than a French one? There is a individual sense of order just like there's a sense of beauty but there is no universal "order".
One of the few things i know about entropy is that it manifests as dissipating heat and as the entropy grows with time and heat dissipates it leads to homogeneity. What confuses me even more is that homogeneity gives me the impression of order rather than disorder and the beginnings of big bang although hot seem to me much more homogenous than the universe at this point.

It fascinates me very much but this important topic confuses me more than anything else from classical physics, if anyone could help me make the meaning of entropy a little more clear I would be very grateful.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Basically, the idea is that because there are a lot more ways how things can be in "disorder" than ways how they can be in "order", it is statistically extremely probable that a system of a large number of molecules is at any given moment moving towards a state of higher disorder.

In statistical mechanics, entropy of a macrostate (macroscopically observed state of a physical system) depends on the number of microstates (combinations of states of individual molecules) that correspond to that observed macrostate. Therefore, increase of entropy is basically a statistical phenomenon, a system is very likely to move towards a state that can be achieved in many ways.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
@hilbert2: Thanks a ton! So can i throw the words "order/disorder" out of the window and just say: "Antropy is the measure of probability of a particular state of a physical system to be delivered by random movement of its components(particles)?"
So a limited set of particles in a physical system can be assigned a limited number of combinations of vector quantities and all the combinations of quantities give rise to a lesser number of combinations of states as the time passes.. and the state that is produced by most of the combinations of vector quantities is of highest entropy?
So the universe started at the most improbable state and ends at the most probable? Seems like the universe is losing it's ridiculousness :)
 
Is it only me being retarded? I mean, to me- "order" is a word that points to just anybody's personal preference of organization of things in any sort of dimension (being it space/time, alphabet or numbering system...) based on his current practical needs or cultural bias. Maybe Jackson Pollock had different concept of order than Rothko. Is an English garden of higher entropy than a French one? There is a individual sense of order just like there's a sense of beauty but there is no universal "order".

In classical mechanics we define entropy as S = -k_B \sum_i p_i \ln p_i.

With this definition in mind, we call states with low entropy "ordered" and states with high entropy "disordered."
Thus, we have very carefully defined what we mean by "order" in the physical context. There is no ambiguity.

One of the few things i know about entropy is that it manifests as dissipating heat and as the entropy grows with time and heat dissipates it leads to homogeneity. What confuses me even more is that homogeneity gives me the impression of order rather than disorder and the beginnings of big bang although hot seem to me much more homogenous than the universe at this point.

Be careful here. Homogeneity can be used to describe systems of both high and low entropy.

Case 1) Imagine that you roll 1,000 dice, and they all come up 6. This is a very ordered result (low entropy) but it is also very homogeneous.

Case 2) Imagine a situation where you take ten different colors of paint and mix them together to get a a uniform (homogeneous) brown. if you look at the pain under a powerful microscope you'd see a random mixture of all ten colors. This is a state a maximum entropy or disorder.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
@the_wolfman: Thanks a lot! I'm afraid the only thing i understand from the equation above is (S) as entropy and (k) as Boltzmann's konstant, but i guess i would need to study more physics to understand the rest.
Still, could anyone please tell me, based on my second post, whether i understood the point of entropy right?
 
danihel said:
Still, could anyone please tell me, based on my second post, whether i understood the point of entropy right?

Yes, you understood the point.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K