Understanding Faraday's Law and Its Effects on Conductors

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Faraday's law Law
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction, specifically focusing on the effects of magnetic fields on conductors and the resulting induced currents. Participants explore the relationship between magnetic flux changes, Lorentz forces, and the behavior of free electrons in conductive materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes how pushing a square loop into a magnetic field results in a change in magnetic flux, inducing a voltage and causing free electrons to move, potentially leading to a current.
  • Another participant notes that if the conducting loop has zero resistance, the induced current will create its own magnetic field, maintaining zero total flux through the loop, but acknowledges that resistance typically leads to current dissipation.
  • A participant emphasizes the rapid random motion of free electrons in a conductor and how their paths are influenced by the magnetic field, while also noting the low drift speed of conduction electrons.
  • Another participant argues that random thermal fluctuations can be ignored, asserting that the net motion of the conductor is what induces current, with forces acting on positive and negative charges in opposite directions.
  • One participant agrees with the previous points but reiterates the low mean drift speed of electrons, suggesting that they move down potential slopes without significant curvature in their paths.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the basic principles of Faraday's law and the effects of magnetic fields on conductors, but there are differing views on the significance of random electron motion and the implications of drift speed. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the extent to which these factors should be considered in understanding induced currents.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about resistance in conductors and the treatment of thermal fluctuations in electron motion. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of the role of drift speed in the context of induced currents.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
When we talk about Faraday's law, we need a change in magnetic flux to create a voltage.
So let's say I have a B field that exists in a square region and then a square loop that is a conductor and I push it into the B field. So as I originally push the square loop into the B field I have a change in magnetic flux, so there will be a voltage and the free electrons in the conductor will start to move. Or I could view it as the free electrons are approaching the B field with a speed v and they will experience a Lorentz force and this will start a current to flow in the loop. But now let's say the loop it completely in the B field, so the magnetic flux is constant. But I still would have a current in the loop because of the Lorentz pushing on the electrons. And I still would have a voltage because I have current in the loop. Am I thinking about this correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, provided the conducting loop has zero resistance. In fact, what will occur is that the current induced will create its own B field so that the total flux through the loop remains zero.

Now usually there's some resistance so the current dissipates and the net B flux grows to the full amount you'd calculate. The heat from the dissipation of the current will tell you exactly how much work it took to push the loop into the B field and thus the force on the wire due to this current and the B field.

The flux analysis is derivable by looking at the Lorentz forces on the charge carriers in the wire as it moves into the B field, (or the induced E field if you don't move the wire but rather change the B field over time).
 
You need to remember that these 'free electrons' are in very rapid random motion and their paths in the metal are all affected by the magnetic field. The mean path is affected as you suggest, though. Also, the drift speed (RMS velocity) of conduction electrons is extremely low.
 
I think you can ignore the random e.g. thermal fluctuations. The magnetic field will simply rotate the random motion which will in turn be symmetrically random as well. It is the net motion of the whole of the conductor which is relevant. Moving the wire across the B field, induces forces along the wire, in one direction for the positive charges, in the other direction for the negative. If either or both are mobile they will flow and you have your net current.
 
I agree totally but the mean drift speed is very low and this is not always acknowledged. Electrons are so slow and low in mass that they move right down the potential slope - no curved paths because of their momentum and they accelerate ' instantaneously' to this speed.
 
ok, interesting thanks for your responses
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K