Understanding Fisher Information: Visualizations & Explanations

saviourmachine
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
Maybe it is a good idea to have mathematical tutorials like in the subforum about Physics. I have no homework anymore :smile: but tend to think that doing mathematics is a skill that always pays back at the end.

First thing I want to know what https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisher_information is. It is according to wikipedia the amount of information that is carried by an observed random variable about an unseen parameter. So, let us consider coin tossing examples. The unknown parameter is the amount in which the coin is biased. De observed random variable is a binary sequence of data point labelled "head" or "tail".

I would like an explanation that uses many visualizations and is not afraid of explaining things when it heads into "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_geometry " for example. I don't have to be able to derive everything myself, but I want to understand the whole terminology.

What is meant by the variance of the score? What is exactly the relation with the Cramér-Rao inequality? What is meant by the Fisher information matrix being a Riemannian metric? Is the distance between points on a differential manifold equal to the amount of information between those points? Can Fisher information be seen as an amount of curvature?

I'm curious to what kind of world this crystallizes in someone's mind. Mathematics does sometimes obscure things instead of just formalizing them. It's possible to do better! http://www.av8n.com/physics/clifford-intro.htm from John Denker about Clifford Algebra is for example an amazing piece of a down to Earth explanation of a "quite" complex concept. Thanks a lot in advance!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It would be easier to answer with specific questions what on the websites you quoted you don't and what do you understand. There are books written on those subjects which makes it difficult to answer in such a generality.

The explanation of mathematics can be done better is probably a discussion as old as mathematics itself. In my experience it depends very much on the individual it is explained to.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top