Understanding Fourier Series: Solving a Tricky Question with Step-by-Step Guide

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a user seeking assistance with part 3 of a Fourier series question after successfully completing part 2. Another participant suggests that sharing the results from exercise 2 could aid in solving part 3. The original poster mentions having a 1/n^2 term in their Fourier series, indicating a potentially correct approach. The conversation emphasizes the importance of choosing an appropriate value for x to progress further. The thread highlights collaborative problem-solving in understanding Fourier series concepts.
VooDoo
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
hey guys,

I got this question that I am a bit stuck on. I have done question two and got the Fourier series, but have no idea how to do part 3. Any help is very appreciated.
http://img453.imageshack.us/img453/5103/file2yp2.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What did you get for exercise 2? That will probably be quite useful information for solving 3!
 
Hi, I got the following for my Fourier series. I have a 1/n^2 term in there which looks good.
http://img392.imageshack.us/img392/5124/11111je7.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Choose an appropriate x.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top