Understanding Gaussian Wave Packets: Momentum, Width, and Amplitude Explained

Click For Summary
A Gaussian wave packet can have an average momentum that is not zero, as it may not be centered at k=0. The width of the wave packet increases over time due to dispersion, making statement II correct. The amplitude of the wave packet does not remain constant, contradicting statement III. Additionally, statement IV is valid, as it reflects the relationship between momentum and coordinate space widths based on Fourier theory. Therefore, statements II and IV are confirmed as correct.
cepheid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,197
Reaction score
38
Hi,

I've got the right answer in this problem, but I'm not sure if I've got the correct reasoning

Homework Statement



A Gaussian wave packet travels through free space. Which of the following statements about the packet are correct for all such wave packets?

I. The average momentum of the wave packet is zero.
II. The width of the wave packet increases with time, as t \rightarrow \infty.
III. The amplitude of the wave packet remains constant with time.
IV. The narrower the wave packet is in momentum space, the wider it is in coordinate space.

The Attempt at a Solution



Here was my reasoning:

I. (INCORRECT) \mathbf{p} = \hbar\mathbf{k}, and the Gaussian need not be peaked at \mathbf{k} = 0.

II. (CORRECT). \mathbf{v}_{\textrm{phase}} = \frac{\hbar\mathbf{k}}{m}, a function of k, therefore dispersion occurs.

III. (INCORRECT) contradicts II.

IV. (CORRECT) This is a basic result of Fourier theory.

Ans: II and IV only are correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump for this thread
 
I know this is a late answer, but I just saw this topic and wanted to answer.

I. is correct, because the wave packet isn't centered at k=0, check Schwabl Quantum Mechanics book page 16. And also it doesn't make sense at all to be around zero, because that will cause the wave packet to include negative wave vectors.

III. With wave packets, you should use Group velocity not phase velocity, which ensures it being constant as you have said (Through the derivative).

Thanks for reading
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K