Understanding Grade Curving to Interpreting Your Exam Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter JG89
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The midterm exam was scored out of 120, with current uncurved grades averaging around 70/120. The TA indicated that grades will be adjusted to achieve an average of 80/120, likely through a Gaussian distribution method. This means students will receive varying point increases based on their raw scores, with those scoring 70/120 expected to reach 80/120 after the curve. Higher scores will see diminishing returns from the curve, with scores above 90/120 resulting in minimal increases. Overall, students should anticipate that the curve will not significantly impact higher scores, while those below 70/120 will still receive low grades despite the adjustment.
JG89
Messages
724
Reaction score
1
I recently had a midterm that was out of 120. My TA just sent an email to everyone saying "The exam grades currently going up are your UNCURVED marks. They will be curved up to 80/120 average, the average before the curve looks to be about 70/120 or a bit lower"

What exactly does this mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
probably a gaussian distribution, so they'll give everyone + X amount of points so that the mean score is 80/120.
 
Yes, the simplest way is to add a fixed number of points to everybody's raw score, but there are other ways to do it. Ask your TA about the exact procedure if you want to be sure.
 
If you got a 70/120, you will have an 80/120. If you have a higher score it would probably be safe to assume your curve will diminish evenly until it is 0 at about 90% or about 107/120. If you got something like 95/120 maybe it will go up to 100. It's impossible to say exactly but you should be in the ball park if you estimate it like that. The curve isn't that big and the better you did the more negligible it will be. If you got upwards of a 90 you probably will end up with a low B. If you got upwards of and 80 you will probably get a very low to mid C. If you got a 70/120 you more or less bombed the test and will get a D+ even with the curve. Anything much below that is a low D or and F.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top