Understanding Hausdorff Dimension of 1-d Line

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Aerostd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Hausdorff dimension of a one-dimensional line is zero when evaluated in two dimensions due to the properties of Lebesgue measure. Specifically, a one-dimensional line can be covered by rectangles with zero length in one coordinate, resulting in a total measure of zero. The discussion highlights the challenge of visualizing the Hausdorff measure, which requires covering the line with circles. It emphasizes that while the radius of the circles can be controlled, an uncountable number of circles is necessary to cover the line, reinforcing the relationship between Hausdorff and Lebesgue measures.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hausdorff measure and dimension
  • Familiarity with Lebesgue measure concepts
  • Basic knowledge of geometric covering techniques
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and theorems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the proof that relates Hausdorff measure to Lebesgue measure
  • Explore the concept of covering sets with n-balls in metric spaces
  • Study the properties of measure zero in different dimensions
  • Learn about the implications of the Hausdorff dimension in fractal geometry
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying real analysis, and researchers interested in measure theory and fractal dimensions.

Aerostd
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I had a question about understanding some basic thing about the Hausdorff dimension. Specifically, I'm trying to understand why the two dimensional Hausdorff dimension of a 1-d line is zero.

In terms of the two dimensional Lebesgue measure, I can see that I can cover the line by a countable union of rectangles, where each rectangle has length of one coordinate = 0.

For example, Suppose the line is [0,1] and lies on the x axis. Then I can cover it with rectangles with their length in the y dimension zero, and in the end, I would have to sum up the measure of each rectangle, and each rectangle would have

m( A_{i} x B_{i} ) = m(A_{i}) m_(B_{i}) = 0. (where A_{i} is in X and B_{i} is in Y)

So I can see how a two dimensional Lebesgue measure of a one dimensional line is zero.

However for Hausdorff measures, I have to use circles to cover the line. I'm not able to visualize this. Can I make the radius so small that it only covers a single number? But in that case I would need an uncountable number of circles? I'm confused since the definition of a Hausdorff measure only let's me control the radius of the n-balls and not anything else, so I can't understand how to play around with the radius to make the two Hausdorff measure zero when covering a line in 1 dimension.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is a theorem that the n-dimensional Hausdorff measure is related to the n-dimensional Lebesgue measure. Thus if H is the n-dimensional Hausdorff measure, and if L is the Lebesgue measure, than there is a constant factor c such that H=cL.

In particular, if something has measure zero for Lebesgue measure, then it has measure zero for Hausdorff measure. Maybe you could look up that proof?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 111 ·
4
Replies
111
Views
6K