Understanding Integral Operator Equation Manipulations w/ θ(t)

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the manipulations of the integral operator equation involving the Heaviside function θ(t), specifically in the context of quantum field theory. The Heaviside function is defined as θ(t1-t2) = {1 for t1>t2, 0 for t1 PREREQUISITES

  • Understanding of Heaviside function θ(t)
  • Familiarity with integral calculus and dummy variables
  • Basic knowledge of quantum field theory concepts
  • Experience with Feynman diagrams and time ordering operators
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of the Heaviside function in mathematical physics
  • Learn about integral manipulation techniques in calculus
  • Explore time ordering operators in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the role of dummy variables in mathematical expressions and their implications
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics and field theory, as well as mathematicians interested in integral calculus and its applications in theoretical frameworks.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Can anyone help med understand the manipulations done to the integral operator equation attached? θ(t) is the heaviside function so:
θ(t1-t2) = {1 for t1>t2 0 t1<t2}
The t1 and t2 are dummy variables and I don't see how the rewriting takes place.
 

Attachments

  • integralequation.png
    integralequation.png
    18.6 KB · Views: 621
Physics news on Phys.org
2nd line: just split the thing into two equal parts and swap the dummy index names on the 2nd half.

3rd line: the 2nd integral (whose upper bound is a dummy variable) can be rewritten over the full range, if you add the step function to remove the bits that are not included in the original integration domain.
 
2nd line I understood of course :)

What I don't understand on the third line is why the bit that is included in the integration from t0 to t and not in t0 to t1 is related to when t1<t2?
 
so, let a<b<c be reals and f be a function. \int_a^b f(x) dx = \int_a^c f(x) \theta(b-x) is what you're trying to see. It might be easiest to see if you split the integral on RHS into integrals from a to b and from b to c.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Okay I get it now - don't know why I got confused by something so simple. One thing that still confuses me though is that the rewriting you see there is actually the time ordering operator in quantum field theory. And it seems that it is related to the Feynman diagrams describing events happening at different physical times t1, t2. But I don't see how this parallel is drawn since the times are really just dummy variables and from my view you can't give them any physical value. I mean should t1>t2 or the opposite?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
533
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K