Understanding Inverses & Max* for Integers

  • Thread starter Thread starter kathrynag
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers Max
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the properties of a group defined on integers with the operation defined as a*b=max{a,b}. It concludes that the operation does not form a group due to the absence of inverses for elements in the set of integers. Specifically, while associativity holds true (max{max{a,b},c} = max{a,b,c}), the identity element is not unique, and inverses do not exist for integers under the defined operation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts such as identity, associativity, and inverses.
  • Familiarity with the mathematical operation max{a,b} and its properties.
  • Basic knowledge of integers and their properties in algebra.
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and logical reasoning.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of groups in abstract algebra, focusing on identity and inverse elements.
  • Explore the implications of non-unique identity elements in group theory.
  • Investigate other operations on integers and their group properties, such as addition and multiplication.
  • Learn about the concept of partially ordered sets and how they relate to operations like max{a,b}.
USEFUL FOR

Students of abstract algebra, mathematicians interested in group theory, and educators teaching group properties and operations on integers.

kathrynag
Messages
595
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If I have a group defined on the integers, by a*b=ab, how do I know if an inverse exists?
Also, define * on the integers by a*b=max{a,b}




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I got 1/a as an inverse, but I'm thinking it's not a group since we don't know if 1/a is an element of the integers.

The max is confusing me.
I know I need to check associativity, identity, and inverse for a group.
a*(b*c)=a*max{b,c)
=max{a,max{b,c}}
(a*b)*c=max{a,b}*c
=max{max{a,b},c}
I'm already confused at this point.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you only need contradict one of the properties for it not to be a group

The first one is correct, for a not equal to e, the inverse does not exist within the group.

For the 2nd
associativity is ok, as max{max{a,b},c} = max{a,b,c}
you could try the identity, whici si clearly not unique
or probably more straight forward show there is no inverse, consider a*b with a<b
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K