Understanding Kirchhoff's Rules for Solving Electrical Circuits

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 392791
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rules
AI Thread Summary
When using Kirchhoff's rules, it's crucial to identify the direction of current flow through a resistor, which always moves from high potential to low potential. To clarify potential differences, start by marking the direction of the current; this will help determine which end of the resistor is at a higher potential. When traversing a resistor in the direction of current, a voltage drop of -IR occurs. Understanding these conventions is essential for solving DC circuit problems effectively. Properly identifying potential differences simplifies the application of Kirchhoff's rules.
member 392791
Hello,

I am having difficulty when trying to solve problems requiring kirchhoffs rules. The problem I seem to be having is following the convention used by my book. I can't tell when the current is gaining potential going across a resistor, or atleast going from low potential to high potential.

The problem seems to stem from not knowing which end of the resistor is at higher potential than the other, so I can do either +IR or -IR

If anyone can clarify, that would be great. Thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The current in a resistor always flows from high potential to low potential. So, once you mark the direction of the current through the resistor, the high potential and low potential ends of the resistor become obvious. Generally, when you are solving dc circuits, and you are required to find the current in a resistor, you start by marking the direction of the current. Then, you mark the high potential end and low potential end of the resistor in such a way that the current is flowing from high potential to low potential.
 
Select your loop. When a resistor is traversed in your chosen loop, along the direction of current, then there is a voltage drop -IR.
 
Thank you for the responses, much appreciated.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...

Similar threads

Back
Top