Understanding L2M2M3 Auger Process

  • Thread starter Thread starter eintagsfliege
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Process
eintagsfliege
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi there

Can someone teach me how a L2M2M3 Auger process looks like?
I appreciate every kind of help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
I hope this may help you:
http://www.nucleide.org/DDEP_WG/introduction.pdf
you may get some information.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I dint find it. I was wondering how it looks in a shell scheme, but anyway thanks for your help Rajini!
 
Hi,
I think 2 and 3 in L2M2M3 represent the subshells (not shell). So it is not highly significant to draw/show these transitions in schematic drawings or in shells schemes (i guess shell schemes means you draw a circular nucleus and draw K,L,M,etc circles around it!). Otherwise one can draw spectroscopic notations (here you draw K, L, M, lines instead of circles).
For example L2M2M3 means: L2 electron is knocked/removed and this vacancy is filled by M2 electron. After wards M3 electron (generally Auger electron) will be automatically removed.
In this article you can find some relevant information on LMM Auger emission.
DOI: 10.1007/s10751-005-9177-1
Hope it helps.
Cheers
 
Thank you rajini! Very nice!
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top