Understanding Life Support Systems

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter davo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Life Support Systems
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Life support systems are critical for maintaining human life in environments such as spacecraft and spacesuits. These systems regulate essential factors like pressure, oxygen levels, temperature, and CO2 removal. CO2 must be removed because it becomes toxic at concentrations above 5%, affecting breathing and blood acidity. The Space Shuttle operates with a nitrogen-oxygen mix at 1 atm, while spacesuits use pure oxygen at 4.3 lb/in², necessitating pre-breathing protocols to avoid decompression sickness.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic atmospheric science
  • Knowledge of human physiology related to respiration
  • Familiarity with spacecraft life support systems
  • Awareness of pressure-related health risks, such as decompression sickness
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the design and function of spacecraft life support systems
  • Learn about the physiological effects of high-pressure oxygen environments
  • Study the principles of gas exchange and CO2 toxicity
  • Explore the history and safety protocols of early space missions, including Apollo 1
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, astronauts, medical professionals, and anyone interested in the science of life support systems in extreme environments.

davo
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
What exactly is life support? Is it somthing on the shuttle or in their suites? Is it just somthing to recreat the environment of Earth? Please can some one elaborate?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It's the general term given to all the stuff that keeps you alive!
The pressure, oxygen, temperature, CO2 removal etc.
 
mgb_phys said:
It's the general term given to all the stuff that keeps you alive!
The pressure, oxygen, temperature, CO2 removal etc.

ok so then it would be in both the suite and shuttle. Now why must CO2 be removed? I mean that's really (except for the 1% [including carbon] of other gases we breath) what we breath in, on this world? So i mean what's so bad about it if this compound has oxygen?
 
Last edited:
CO2 is about 0.03% of air but it is toxic at about 5% (about the same concentration as you breathing out) - ifyou don't remeove it from the air it eventually kills you.
CO2 controls your breathing and blood acidity among other things.

YOu can breath in either air or pure oxygen, the only thing you NEED is O2, butthe rest of the air just has to not have anything toxic. Early US capsules used pure O2 but it was a nasty fire risk, modern craft use air and add extra oxygen from tanks as it used up while at the same time removing CO2.

The shuttle flies with a shirt sleeves atmosphere, you don't need a suit inside it, the suit backpack basically contains smaller versions of the shuttle life support systems.
A submarine or a scuba diving rebreather is a similair system.
 
Last edited:
You may also consider the systems on board that assist other bodily functions to be "life support" systems as well...
 
mgb_phys said:
The shuttle flies with a shirt sleeves atmosphere, you don't need a suit inside it, the suit backpack basically contains smaller versions of the shuttle life support systems.

Not quite. While the Shuttle uses a nitrogen-oxygen mix at 1 atm, the suits still use pure oxygen at 4.3 lb/in².

This leads to one drawback. Since the astronauts are breathing a nitrogen-oxygen mix in the shuttle, they have nitrogen disolved in their blood. If they were to go directly to the lower pressure of the suit, the nitrogen would bubble out and they'd get the "bends".

To get around this, an astronaut planning to go EVA has to breathe pure oxygen from a portable unit for 2.5 hrs prior to donning his suit. This flushes the nitrogen out of his blood.
 
Janus said:
Not quite. While the Shuttle uses a nitrogen-oxygen mix at 1 atm, the suits still use pure oxygen at 4.3 lb/in².
Interesting - presumably to reduce the pressure load on the suit and stop it doing a 'michelin man', I suppose there isn't much fire risk inside a suit.
 
Fire risk is dependent on [partial] pressure, so it is greatly reduced by the reduced pressure. That's what makes the error that led to the Apollo 1 fire all the more idiotic. It was acutally pressurized - above atmospheric pressure, with pure oxygen. All sorts of normally benign things become flammable under those conditions.
 
Really! I had always assumed the Mercury capsules were run at near 0.21bar and 100% O2 to reduce the mechanical stress while giving a normal ppO2.
Apart from the fire risk, there is a danger of a CNS hit if you are highly physically stressed at high O2 partial pressures.
 
  • #10
wow that's a lot of stuff that i really wanta learn but i don't curntly. lol. what sciences do you learn that stuff in?
 
  • #11
I'm an astronomer and diving instructor.
 
  • #12
mgb_phys said:
I'm an astronomer and diving instructor.

then you could really help me in my WAS program, right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 148 ·
5
Replies
148
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
727