Understanding Miller Indices to Interpreting Crystal Planes

  • Thread starter Thread starter _Andreas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Indices
_Andreas
Messages
141
Reaction score
1
They confuse me. If someone tells me a plane has the index, say (233), it's very difficult for me to see where it intercepts the crystal axes. What are they good for?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The properties of a solid differ depending on directions in the crystal structure. Some examples:
Stress and strain (you can apply a squeezing force along one axis and see bulging or contraction along another)
Piezoelectricity
Xray diffraction
Wave propagation
The most important practical applications of Miller indices are in semiconductor device physics. Look at any semiconductor research article and you'll see the parameter or measurement under discussion is indexed to a direction like (100) in Silicon.
 
Thanks.

But let's go back to the plane with index (233). I want to draw it in a coordinate system with the crystal axes a, b, and c. I know from my textbook that its coordinates in this coordinate system are (3,2,2) (that is, the plane intercepts the axes at 3a, 2b and 2c). But how do I get this information if I only know the index? I know how to get the index from knowing the coordinates, but vice versa seems to be more difficult.
 
Last edited:
try this tutorial...

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=110233
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dr Transport said:
try this tutorial...

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=110233


i am getting a n error message whew i want to open this
 
Last edited by a moderator:
_Andreas said:
Thanks.

But let's go back to the plane with index (233). I want to draw it in a coordinate system with the crystal axes a, b, and c. I know from my textbook that its coordinates in this coordinate system are (3,2,2) (that is, the plane intercepts the axes at 3a, 2b and 2c). But how do I get this information if I only know the index? I know how to get the index from knowing the coordinates, but vice versa seems to be more difficult.

do the same thing for vice versa also
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top