Understanding Molecular Collisions in Gases

AI Thread Summary
Molecular collisions in gases do not involve direct contact like billiard balls; instead, they are characterized by non-destructive interactions influenced by electromagnetic forces and dipole moments. When molecules approach each other, their electron orbitals can overlap, leading to repulsive forces that prevent actual contact. This behavior allows for the effective modeling of gas molecules as if they were colliding in a macroscopic sense. The discussion raises questions about the implications of molecular geometry on gas viscosity, suggesting that understanding molecular shape is crucial for accurate modeling. Overall, the interaction dynamics of molecules are complex and require consideration of both physical and chemical principles.
Aero51
Messages
545
Reaction score
10
Hey, I'm not sure if this should be in the chemistry or physics section,. Hopefully it is in the right place. I have a question about molecular collisions: specifically, what actually happens when two molecules "collide". Perhaps a better question is: "what constitutes a molecular collision?". Since I have some background in physical gas dynamics and modern physics, I know that it is not possible for the two molecules to actually "touch" each other in the sense of two billiard balls colliding. On this subject, since molecules do not collide in the macroscopic sense, why do they behave as if they are, as stated earlier, billiard balls in a container? If anyone has good references or books please share those too!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is sufficient to have any sort of non-destructive interaction to make "billard balls in a container" a good model. If molecules come close to each other, their dipole moments can influence each other via the electromagnetic interaction. If they come even closer, their electron orbitals begin to overlap, which (usually) generates a repulsive force.
 
It is sufficient to have any sort of non-destructive interaction to make "billard balls in a container" a good model.

If this is true then what about gases with viscosity? Wouldn't that require one to know (or assume) something about the geometry of the molecules?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top