Understanding moment of inertia values

AI Thread Summary
Moment of inertia (MOI) quantifies an object's resistance to rotational acceleration around a specific axis, analogous to how mass measures resistance to linear acceleration. The confusion arises from misinterpreting MOI units; it is expressed as mass times length squared (ML²), not as a pressure value. When an object like a stick of butter glides without rotation, the MOI value indicates how much torque is needed to initiate rotation, rather than affecting its current state of motion. A higher MOI means more torque is required for the same angular acceleration, especially for objects with mass distributed farther from the axis of rotation. Understanding MOI is crucial for predicting how an object will respond to applied forces and torques.
lovethepirk
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I have done some extensive self study on MOI but I don't understand it's meaning in application.

An example is imagine a stick of butter is dropped on the ground. Now ignoring friction and the other variables we can remove for learning purposes, let's assume the butter stick is kicked and it is gliding along the ground and it isn't rolling or rotating at all...it is just gliding almost like a knuckleball...no movement other than the friction-less glide across the ground.

On it's vertical axis it has a MOI value of 4000 grams/cm^2. THIS is where I am confused. I understand this is the torque needed for a desired angular acceleration, but I need help...If this object has no rotation on it's vertical axis b/c it is just gliding along the ground and some pressure of 4000 grams/cm^2 is placed on this object what does this do to the spinning/rotating along the vertical? Does 3999 grams/cm^2 not even change any motion?

I feel any pressure applied to this object would change the rotation so what does 4000 actual represent? Does it represent a certain predetermined amount of some units of rotation speed?

I hope I am articulating my confusion correct...I just don't know what the 4000 is actually telling me. I'm almost in my mind trying to predict what the stick of butter is going to do given a certain rock it hits on the ground that changes its motion assuming this rock applies 4000 of pressure or maybe other values of pressure.

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lovethepirk said:
On it's vertical axis it has a MOI value of 4000 grams/cm^2.
The correct dimensions for MOI would be mass*length2.

lovethepirk said:
THIS is where I am confused. I understand this is the torque needed for a desired angular acceleration, but I need help...
Think of MOI as the rotational analog to mass. Just as mass tells you, via Newton's 2nd law, how much force is required to produce a given translational acceleration, the moment of inertia tells you how much torque is required to produce a given rotational acceleration.
 
lovethepirk said:
I have done some extensive self study on MOI but I don't understand it's meaning in application.

An example is imagine a stick of butter is dropped on the ground. Now ignoring friction and the other variables we can remove for learning purposes, let's assume the butter stick is kicked and it is gliding along the ground and it isn't rolling or rotating at all...it is just gliding almost like a knuckleball...no movement other than the friction-less glide across the ground.

On it's vertical axis it has a MOI value of 4000 grams/cm^2. THIS is where I am confused. I understand this is the torque needed for a desired angular acceleration, but I need help...If this object has no rotation on it's vertical axis b/c it is just gliding along the ground and some pressure of 4000 grams/cm^2 is placed on this object what does this do to the spinning/rotating along the vertical? Does 3999 grams/cm^2 not even change any motion?

I feel any pressure applied to this object would change the rotation so what does 4000 actual represent? Does it represent a certain predetermined amount of some units of rotation speed?

I hope I am articulating my confusion correct...I just don't know what the 4000 is actually telling me. I'm almost in my mind trying to predict what the stick of butter is going to do given a certain rock it hits on the ground that changes its motion assuming this rock applies 4000 of pressure or maybe other values of pressure.

thanks.
Well, your first misconception about MOI is the units. MOI is measured in units of ML2, as in mass * length2, not mass / length2.
Pressure has units of F / A, or properly derived M*L*T-2*L-2 = M*L-1T-2.

In terms of the motion of a stick of butter (what is the vertical axis for this, anyway?) or a ball or a rock, the pressure due to contact is not what is essential to the analysis.
 
Thanks for the help and correction on units. How do you conceptualize what grams*cm^2 is. I can conceptualize mass b/c I can see a cubic cm of metal in my right hand, but I can't figure out what grams*cm^2 is.

My ignorant guess is 4000 grams*cm^2 is equivalent to the force of 4000 grams across and area of 1cmx1cm.
 
lovethepirk said:
Thanks for the help and correction on units. How do you conceptualize what grams*cm^2 is. I can conceptualize mass b/c I can see a cubic cm of metal in my right hand, but I can't figure out what grams*cm^2 is.

My ignorant guess is 4000 grams*cm^2 is equivalent to the force of 4000 grams across and area of 1cmx1cm.

No, you're still stuck in thinking that the MOI is like some kind of pressure value.

The higher the value of the MOI of an object, the harder it is to rotate that object when a given amount of torque is applied. That's all it means.

For objects with most of their mass concentrated around the axis of rotation, their MOI will be lower than an object whose mass is distributed farther away from that same axis. That's why it's harder to twirl a dumbbell with two large masses connected by a bar than it is to twirl a single large mass with the same bar stuck thru it.
 
lovethepirk said:
I can conceptualize mass b/c I can see a cubic cm of metal in my right hand
That is volume, not mass.

The correct way to conceptualize mass is by inertia: How much linear force do you need to accelerate it linearly. And moment of inertia is: How much torque do you need to accelerate it angularly.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top