Understanding Negative Pressure and its Role in the Expansion of the Universe

  • Thread starter Thread starter zeromodz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Negative Pressure
AI Thread Summary
Negative pressure is theorized to contribute to the universe's expansion by creating a form of repulsive gravity, though there is currently no conclusive evidence supporting the existence of repulsive gravity itself. Some discussions suggest that negative gravitational energy might balance other energies in the universe, leading to a total energy of zero; however, this is more a matter of calculation convention than a physical reality. The concept of dark energy, often associated with negative pressure, is recognized in general relativity and is believed to drive the acceleration of cosmic expansion. While there are indications that gravity behaves differently on large scales, these observations do not definitively prove the existence of repulsive gravity. Overall, the relationship between negative pressure and cosmic expansion remains an area of ongoing research and debate.
zeromodz
Messages
244
Reaction score
0
I read somewhere that negative pressure is responsible for repulsive gravity that is increasing the expansion of the universe. Can repulsive gravity exist? and if so how is it related to negative pressure?

I also heard that the negative gravitational energy compensates for all other energies in the universe making the total energy in the universe zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zeromodz said:
Can repulsive gravity exist? and if so how is it related to negative pressure?
There is no evidence for repulsive gravity, there are possible measurements that suggest the normal law of gravity isn't quite right on large scales (gravity is weaker than it shoudl be) but nothing conclusive.

I also heard that the negative gravitational energy compensates for all other energies in the universe making the total energy in the universe zero.
This isn't 'negative gravity' it's just how you do the calculation. If you start with the mass in one point and lift the masses outward it's easier to make that energy negative, so when the mass is attracted back inward, that movement is postive - but it's purely a question of convention. It was once thought that the energy of the gravity expansion balanced the mass-energy of the rest if the universe - that isn't true.
 
mgb_phys said:
It was once thought that the energy of the gravity expansion balanced the mass-energy of the rest if the universe - that isn't true.

On what premise have we discredited this? Did we disprove this somehow?
 
mgb_phys said:
There is no evidence for [..]
It sounds like the OP is referring to dark energy which, if I understand correctly, can be represented as negative pressure in GR's source tensor, has a repulsive consequence of accelerating intergalactic expansion, and still figures prominently in the mainstream picture.
 
ok - I thought they mean the pioneer anomoly
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I How Does Negative Pressure Influence the Expansion of the Universe?
Replies
10
Views
2K
Origin of the "underpressure" or "negative phase" in a blast wave
Replies
11
Views
2K
Negative pressure from vacuum to shunt a object upwards?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Physics C: Mechanics - Negative Energy and Potential Energy Curves
Replies
5
Views
2K
B Questions about the Universe: Positive & negative fields and effects
Replies
4
Views
4K
I Questions about Negative Pressure and Vacuum Energy
Replies
5
Views
3K
How pressure affects partial pressures (and dewpoint)
Replies
10
Views
2K
I How to interpret this definition of potential energy?
Replies
10
Views
2K
Is atmospheric pressure gravitational or kinetic?
Replies
20
Views
18K
B Why doesn't cosmic inflation violate conservation of energy?
Replies
3
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top