Understanding Norms: Why is f(0) = 0 Necessary?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dirk_mec1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definitions
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around the necessity of the condition f(0) = 0 for a function to qualify as a norm. Participants are exploring the implications of this condition in the context of differentiability and the definition of norms.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants question the necessity of f(0) = 0 for E to be a norm and its relation to differentiability. Others inquire about the definition of a norm and whether it includes conditions for constant functions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants raising questions about definitions and conditions related to norms. There is no explicit consensus, but various interpretations and clarifications are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the 'definiteness' condition in the absence of the assumption f(0) = 0, indicating a potential gap in the provided definitions or assumptions.

dirk_mec1
Messages
755
Reaction score
13
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You didn't state your definition of norm. Does you definition include ||f||>0 if f is not 0? Think of the norm of a constant function.
 
Fine. Check the 'definiteness' condition without the assumption f(0)=0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K