Understanding of Voltage potential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the terminology and notation of voltage potential, specifically the notation Voa, which refers to the voltage of point "o" with respect to point "a." Participants clarify that the first subscript indicates the reference point, while the second indicates the point being measured. Consistency in sign definitions and current directions is emphasized as crucial for accurate circuit analysis, particularly when applying Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL). The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the context and definitions used in electrical engineering to avoid errors in calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Familiarity with electrical circuit notation
  • Knowledge of voltage measurement terminology
  • Basic principles of current direction in circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law in complex circuits
  • Learn about voltage potential measurement techniques
  • Study the significance of reference nodes in circuit analysis
  • Explore common mistakes in circuit analysis related to sign conventions
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in analyzing or designing electrical circuits will benefit from this discussion.

PhysicsTest
Messages
256
Reaction score
27
TL;DR
I want to understand the voltage potential
I am bit confused with voltage potential terminology again to basics
1691477770970.png

When it is referred as Voa it is Voltage of "o" wrt "a". Is it correct?
But other major question is
1691477865309.png

as per the document

I would have written KVL as Voa - I1 * Z = Vn. I am really confused with notation used.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
PhysicsTest said:
TL;DR Summary: I want to understand the voltage potential

When it is referred as Voa it is Voltage of "o" wrt "a". Is it correct?
Since all of the measurements are relative the the "O" node, i"O" is the 'reference' node (or 'common' node), this is often referred to as 'Ground', even if it is not connected to the actual Ground or Earth.

So VOA is Voltage of "A" wrt "O".

In general, the first subscript (in this case 'O') is the Reference point and the second subscript is the point being measured. Another way to remember it is 'from' and 'to' for the subscripts.

Hope this helps!

Cheers,
Tom
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhysicsTest
PhysicsTest said:
I would have written KVL as Voa - I1 * Z = Vn. I am really confused with notation used.
Me too. But as long as you are consistent with the sign definitions the equations will give you the correct answer regardless.
 
PhysicsTest said:
I would have written KVL as Voa - I1 * Z = Vn.
I too agree. But (though not an electrical engineer) can I add this.

Using ##V_{on} = V_{oa} + ZI_1## etc. is not consistent with the assumed current-directions shown in the diagram. It is not the usual practice in my experience. I would (as an ex-teacher) mark it wrong.

When setting up the equations, the signs in the equations must be consistent with the assumed current directions.

For example, in more complicated circuits with 'loops', different currents can flow through the same component. E.g. there might be ##I_4## flowing through a resistor in one direction and ##I_5## flowing through the same resistor in the opposite direction. In such situations, not following strict rules about the use signs can lead to errors. Is thecurrent through the resistor ##I_4+I_5, I_4-I_5, -I_4+I_5## or ##-I_4-I_5##? You need to be able to pick the correct one!
 
Tom.G said:
Since all of the measurements are relative the the "O" node, i"O" is the 'reference' node (or 'common' node), this is often referred to as 'Ground', even if it is not connected to the actual Ground or Earth.

So VOA is Voltage of "A" wrt "O".

In general, the first subscript (in this case 'O') is the Reference point and the second subscript is the point being measured. Another way to remember it is 'from' and 'to' for the subscripts.

Hope this helps!

Cheers,
Tom
In my experience, you will not find a consensus either way with this definition. The important thing is to be consistent within a single analysis and to understand as best as possible from the context which definitions are being used.

Again, the definitions of various polarities can be arbitrary, but strict consistency in their application is mandatory.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K