Understanding of Voltage potential

AI Thread Summary
Voltage potential terminology can be confusing, particularly regarding the notation Voa, which denotes the voltage of point "A" with respect to point "O." The "O" node is typically considered the reference or common node, often referred to as 'Ground,' even if not physically connected to the Earth. Consistency in sign definitions is crucial when applying Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) to avoid errors, especially in complex circuits with multiple current directions. While definitions may vary, maintaining clarity and consistency within a single analysis is essential for accurate results. Understanding these concepts is key to mastering voltage potential in electrical engineering.
PhysicsTest
Messages
246
Reaction score
26
TL;DR Summary
I want to understand the voltage potential
I am bit confused with voltage potential terminology again to basics
1691477770970.png

When it is referred as Voa it is Voltage of "o" wrt "a". Is it correct?
But other major question is
1691477865309.png

as per the document

I would have written KVL as Voa - I1 * Z = Vn. I am really confused with notation used.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
PhysicsTest said:
TL;DR Summary: I want to understand the voltage potential

When it is referred as Voa it is Voltage of "o" wrt "a". Is it correct?
Since all of the measurements are relative the the "O" node, i"O" is the 'reference' node (or 'common' node), this is often referred to as 'Ground', even if it is not connected to the actual Ground or Earth.

So VOA is Voltage of "A" wrt "O".

In general, the first subscript (in this case 'O') is the Reference point and the second subscript is the point being measured. Another way to remember it is 'from' and 'to' for the subscripts.

Hope this helps!

Cheers,
Tom
 
  • Like
Likes PhysicsTest
PhysicsTest said:
I would have written KVL as Voa - I1 * Z = Vn. I am really confused with notation used.
Me too. But as long as you are consistent with the sign definitions the equations will give you the correct answer regardless.
 
PhysicsTest said:
I would have written KVL as Voa - I1 * Z = Vn.
I too agree. But (though not an electrical engineer) can I add this.

Using ##V_{on} = V_{oa} + ZI_1## etc. is not consistent with the assumed current-directions shown in the diagram. It is not the usual practice in my experience. I would (as an ex-teacher) mark it wrong.

When setting up the equations, the signs in the equations must be consistent with the assumed current directions.

For example, in more complicated circuits with 'loops', different currents can flow through the same component. E.g. there might be ##I_4## flowing through a resistor in one direction and ##I_5## flowing through the same resistor in the opposite direction. In such situations, not following strict rules about the use signs can lead to errors. Is thecurrent through the resistor ##I_4+I_5, I_4-I_5, -I_4+I_5## or ##-I_4-I_5##? You need to be able to pick the correct one!
 
Tom.G said:
Since all of the measurements are relative the the "O" node, i"O" is the 'reference' node (or 'common' node), this is often referred to as 'Ground', even if it is not connected to the actual Ground or Earth.

So VOA is Voltage of "A" wrt "O".

In general, the first subscript (in this case 'O') is the Reference point and the second subscript is the point being measured. Another way to remember it is 'from' and 'to' for the subscripts.

Hope this helps!

Cheers,
Tom
In my experience, you will not find a consensus either way with this definition. The important thing is to be consistent within a single analysis and to understand as best as possible from the context which definitions are being used.

Again, the definitions of various polarities can be arbitrary, but strict consistency in their application is mandatory.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top