Understanding Quantum Tic Tac Toe & Event Horizon

  • Thread starter Thread starter melrose
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum Toe
melrose
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
can anyone help me understand it?

also, does an event horizon only refer to black holes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wasnt allowed to link to it. I wasn't trying to spam. I just wanted to know if anyone has played it...and to explain it to me...
this forum is strict hu?
 
What do you mean you weren't allowed to link to it? Did someone delete your link? Personally, I've never heard of quantum tic tac toe, so cannot help you with that.

Your second question is to do with relativity, not quantum physics-- you should avoid asking unrelated questions in the same thread. However, to answer it, no; event horizons are not only related to black holes. An event horizon is defined as a boundary beyond which an event cannot affect an observer.
 
Last edited:
melrose said:
I wasnt allowed to link to it. I wasn't trying to spam. I just wanted to know if anyone has played it...and to explain it to me...
this forum is strict hu?

If you don't not wish to make an effort to elaborate on what you are asking, at the very least, make an exact reference to what you are referring to (no personal website or crackpot sites, please). Otherwise, don't expect any rational answer.

Zz.
 
melrose said:
can anyone help me understand it?

also, does an event horizon only refer to black holes?

You can find more in American Journal of Physics -- November 2006 -- Volume 74, Issue 11, pp. 962-973.

But you might have well been asking about the concept of superposition in QM. The answer would cover more or less the same topics.

marlon
 
I found it ...

I found what I was looking for ...a paper about it." a teaching metaphor"
it was about superposition

basically quantum tic tac toe is about superposition and it is cyclical and self-referential and has a game tree with dead ends... all very interesting
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
803
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
7K
Back
Top