Understanding Reactive Power Measurements with a Smart Meter

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sebastian Neo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistor
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the measurements of reactive power using a smart meter in a microgrid setup. Participants explore the implications of negative reactive power readings and the accuracy of the smart meter in relation to the load bank and power supply configuration.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports measuring 500W and -40Var with a current of 0.71A, expressing confusion over the negative reactive power reading.
  • Another participant explains that negative VARs indicate a capacitive load, suggesting that there may be additional factors in the setup not mentioned.
  • A participant questions whether the setup is single-phase, noting discrepancies in expected current calculations based on the reported values.
  • There is a discussion about the ambiguity in the original poster's description regarding the behavior of reactive power as current increases, specifically whether it becomes a larger negative number.
  • Concerns are raised about the accuracy of the smart meter and whether the reported discrepancies fall within its guaranteed performance.
  • Participants discuss the implications of using a single-phase smart meter to measure three-phase power, suggesting that the observed behavior may be expected under those conditions.
  • The original poster clarifies that they are using an ABB A44 meter and provides additional details about the total and phase-specific power and reactive power measurements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of the negative reactive power readings and the accuracy of the smart meter. There is no consensus on the implications of the measurements or the setup configuration.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential ambiguities in the setup description and the assumptions made regarding phase configuration and meter accuracy. The discussion highlights the complexity of measuring reactive power in a multi-phase system with a single-phase meter.

Sebastian Neo
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I was doing some test with the load bank today and I obtain a value which I don't quite understand.
I supply a 400V Line to Line, 50Hz to a smart meter and to the resistor load bank. The measured value by the smart meter was 500W and -40Var with a current of 0.71A. As the current increases, the real power increases and the reactive power decreases further.

I know that there is no such thing as ideal load but to have a negative reactive power does not make any sense.

Please kindly advice. Thank you
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
:welcome:

Negative VARs just means a capacitive load.

What doesn't make sense is so many VARs of either sign with just a smart meter and a resistor bank. There must be more to the story, something else in the setup that you didn't mention.
 
the setup was quite simple. I am taking supply from the main power grid into my microgrid and to my smart meter which is connected to the resistor bank.
That's all for my setup
 
A couple of thoughts:

1. Can i assume single phase ?

500 watts and 40 vars is only 501.6 VA
what is the advertised accuracy of your smart meter ? Do your discrepancies fall outside its guaranteed performance?

2. With single phase 501.6VA at 400 volts is 1.254 amps not 0.71,
however
1.254 divided by √3 = 0.723, within 2% of what you report measuring.
So was my assumption of single phase perhaps wrong?

3. There's an ambiguity in your description.
Sebastian Neo said:
As the current increases, the real power increases and the reactive power decreases further.
By 'decreases' do you mean becomes a larger negative number as in moving toward -50, -60, -70 vars?

4. If this is three phase recall that when PF = 1 the line current and line-line voltage are displaced by 30 degrees, which at first glance looks like a PF of about 0.87. That's why there's a two wattmeter method for measuring three phase power.
If you are trying to measure three phase power with a single phase "smart meter", it sounds to me like everything is behaving pretty much as it should.

5. So, what's your "smart meter" ? Got a link to its instruction manual ? And a sketch of your hookup?
 
jim hardy said:
A couple of thoughts:

1. Can i assume single phase ?

500 watts and 40 vars is only 501.6 VA
what is the advertised accuracy of your smart meter ? Do your discrepancies fall outside its guaranteed performance?

2. With single phase 501.6VA at 400 volts is 1.254 amps not 0.71,
however
1.254 divided by √3 = 0.723, within 2% of what you report measuring.
So was my assumption of single phase perhaps wrong?

3. There's an ambiguity in your description.

By 'decreases' do you mean becomes a larger negative number as in moving toward -50, -60, -70 vars?

4. If this is three phase recall that when PF = 1 the line current and line-line voltage are displaced by 30 degrees, which at first glance looks like a PF of about 0.87. That's why there's a two wattmeter method for measuring three phase power.
If you are trying to measure three phase power with a single phase "smart meter", it sounds to me like everything is behaving pretty much as it should.

5. So, what's your "smart meter" ? Got a link to its instruction manual ? And a sketch of your hookup?
By 'decreases' do you mean becomes a larger negative number as in moving toward -50, -60, -70 vars?
Yes, that's what i meant.

I am using ABB A44 meter.

544W is total power for all 3 phase. single phase voltage is 230V. Current for Phase A is 0.71A. Power for 1 phase is 178W.

Total reactive power is -38.94. Phase A reactive power is -15.55 Var, Phase B is -4.92 Var and Phase C is -18.46 VAr
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K