Reactive power compensation in power system

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a numerical problem related to reactive power compensation in a power system, specifically focusing on the calculation of the capacitor bank rating required at bus B when connected to bus A through a transmission line. Participants explore the implications of complex power demands at both buses and the assumptions made in the provided solution.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the assumption that real power at bus B is 1 pu, given that the problem states the complex power demand is 1 pu.
  • Another participant asserts that with zero resistances, real power at bus B must equal that at bus A, as there is no other source for power.
  • Several participants discuss the maximum power transfer equation and its implications for the reactive power requirement at bus B.
  • A participant raises a concern about how to determine that the power demand at bus B is purely active (1 pu) rather than having a reactive component.
  • Another participant introduces a rule of thumb regarding the relationship between voltage angle differences and power transfer, suggesting that without a voltage magnitude difference, there would be no reactive power transfer.
  • One participant proposes a scenario where if the load at bus B is purely reactive, the capacitor bank would need to supply all the reactive power, suggesting the problem may be asking for a minimum rating.
  • Another participant agrees with the interpretation that the capacitor bank's rating could be viewed as a minimum requirement under certain conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the assumptions regarding real and reactive power at bus B, with some asserting that real power must equal that at bus A, while others question this assumption. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of the power demand at bus B and the implications for the capacitor bank rating.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may lack clarity regarding the definitions of active and reactive power at bus B, and there are unresolved questions about the assumptions made in the calculations. The discussion also highlights the dependence on the specific conditions of the transmission line and the nature of the loads at each bus.

cnh1995
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
3,489
Reaction score
1,163
I am trying to understand the solution provided to a numerical problem based on reactive power compensation.

Here's the problem:
Two buses A and B are connected by a transmission line of reactance j0.5 pu. Voltages at both the buses are 1 pu. Bus A is connected to a generator. If the complex power demand at bus A and bus B is 1 pu each, what is the rating of the capacitor bank connected at bus B. (There is one capacitor bank at bus 2).

Since there is no real power source at bus B, all the real power at bus B must be coming from bus A, through the transmission line. Fine.

In the solution provided, they say "since voltages at both the buses are 1 pu, real power at bus B is also 1 pu." I am having trouble understanding this. How can we assume this? The question says "complex" power at bus B is 1 pu. Why is real power at bus B 1 pu?
(Final answer given: rating of the capacitor bank= 0.268 MVAR).
Are they asking for the "minimum" rating?

Thanks a lot in advance!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There must be more in the problem statement than you posted.

With zero resistances, real power at B must be the same as at A. Where else could the power go?
 
Here's the original problem (Q 29).
Screenshot_20170122-184522.png
 
For each bus, you can write:

S = V I * where I* equal I-conjugate

So, at bus 1 (or A), V = 1/0 or 1 pu at an angle of 0 degrees.

Since V = 1 and S = 1, I* must equal 1 + j0 for the load at that bus. So, I also = 0.

At bus 2, S is also equal to 1 pu.

The maximum power transfer equation for what is sent from bus 1 to bus 2 is:

P1-2 = V1 * V2 / X * sin(θ1-2) where V1 and V2 are just magnitudes

So, with 1 pu power demand at bus 2, you can solve this equation:

1 = 1 * 1 / 0.5 * sin(θ1-2)

or

sin(θ1-2) = 0.5

Inverse sine tells you θ1-2 represents an angle of 30 degrees

Therefore, bus 2 lags bus 1 by 30 degrees. Sending bus always leads the receiving bus.

So with S2 = 1, what is the reactive power requirement at bus 2?

We know that I12 = (V1 – V2)/jX

I12 = (1 – 1/-30)/j0.5

= (0.134 + j 0.5)/j0.5

= 1 - j0.2679

Since the real part (1 pu) is sent from bus 1, the reactive part is 0.268 pu, which the capacitor bank supplies.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy and cnh1995
magoo said:
For each bus, you can write:

S = V I * where I* equal I-conjugate

So, at bus 1 (or A), V = 1/0 or 1 pu at an angle of 0 degrees.

Since V = 1 and S = 1, I* must equal 1 + j0 for the load at that bus. So, I also = 0.

At bus 2, S is also equal to 1 pu.

The maximum power transfer equation for what is sent from bus 1 to bus 2 is:

P1-2 = V1 * V2 / X * sin(θ1-2) where V1 and V2 are just magnitudes

So, with 1 pu power demand at bus 2, you can solve this equation:

1 = 1 * 1 / 0.5 * sin(θ1-2)

or

sin(θ1-2) = 0.5

Inverse sine tells you θ1-2 represents an angle of 30 degrees

Therefore, bus 2 lags bus 1 by 30 degrees. Sending bus always leads the receiving bus.

So with S2 = 1, what is the reactive power requirement at bus 2?

We know that I12 = (V1 – V2)/jX

I12 = (1 – 1/-30)/j0.5

= (0.134 + j 0.5)/j0.5

= 1 - j0.2679

Since the real part (1 pu) is sent from bus 1, the reactive part is 0.268 pu, which the capacitor bank supplies.
Thanks @magoo for your answer. I understand the math here.
My question is, how do I know that the 1pu demand at bus 2 is the active power demand? How can I know that SB=1+j0 pu and not 0.8+j0.6 pu (or something else)?

I understand that there is no generator at bus B, hence, its 1 pu power demand is fulfilled by bus A through the transmission line. From the given data, how should I determine that SB=1+j0 (i.e. SB has no reactive component)?
 
The rule of thumb I was taught was that:

- A difference in voltage angle between two busses results in MW or power transfer

- A difference in voltage magnitude between two busses results in MVAR or reactive power transfer

Since we don’t have a difference in voltage magnitude, there will be no reactive power transfer.

We know that P1-2 is 1 pu. Therefore, the reactive load is supplied by means of the capacitor bank at Bus 2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cnh1995
magoo said:
A difference in voltage magnitude between two busses results in MVAR or reactive power transfer
Q=|V1||V2|cosδ/XL-V22/XL.

This means, even if voltages of the two ends are equal, there can still be some reactive power flowing, depending on δ.
 
Last edited:
What if δ=0° and the load at bus B is purely reactive? This makes PAB=QAB=0. But since load on bus B is reactive, SB=QB=1pu=0+j1.
In this case, entire reactive power demand on bus 2 is fulfilled by the capacitor bank, so its rating should be 1 pu.

Is it possible that they are asking "minimum" rating of the capacitor bank?
This makes sense, because if SB=PB= 1 pu, QB=0. So the reactive power supplied by the source at bus A is absorbed by the capacitor bank at B, and no reactive power flows to the load at bus B. This will be the minimum reactive power required to be supplied by the capacitor bank.
 
Yes. I agree with you.

I interpreted your problem as a transmission line, like 220 kV or 400 kV. Our transmission lines in the U.S. are typically interconnected so that in many situations you can control the voltage magnitudes at each end to be close to 1 pu and thereby minimize var flow.

If the line is radial in nature, then you would get a voltage drop in both magnitude and phase angle from A to B or 1-2.

I didn't get a chance to deal with your latest post which I just received and will look at it tomorrow.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cnh1995

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K