Understanding Refraction: Molecular Structures and their Unique Effect on Light

  • Thread starter Thread starter !Live_4Ever!
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Refraction is influenced by the molecular structure of substances, which determines their optical density and index of refraction. Higher optical density correlates with slower light propagation, as seen in dense materials like diamond, where light slows significantly due to its tightly packed molecular arrangement. Conversely, substances with looser molecular structures, such as air, allow light to pass through more easily, resulting in lower optical density and a lower index of refraction. The unique arrangement of molecules affects how light interacts with them, leading to varying angles of refraction across different materials. Understanding these relationships is crucial for comprehending how light behaves in various media.
!Live_4Ever!
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Here is a small exerpt I found while searching the internet.

"To decipher the phenomenon of refraction, we have to go down to the molecular level of substances. Optical density is directly associated with the index of refraction where the more optically dense a substance is, the higher the index of refraction it will have. The optical density of a substance correlates to the speed at which photons propagate through it. The wavelengths of photons (or EM radiation) are on the same scale as the size of the molecules. Because the molecular structure of every substance is unique, the way in which that structure interacts with the photons is also unique. This statement can ultimately conclude that the molecular structure of a substance determines its optical density, thereby determining its angle of refraction."

I seriously don't get this part: "Because the molecular structure of every substance is unique, the way in which that structure interacts with the photons is also unique."

Does anyone mind elaborating on that part? what kind of molecular structure of substances affect light refraciton differently from other molecular structures?? I am at a loss
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider firing a bullet into different media. It should make sense that the denser the medium, the harder it will be for the bullet to propgate through it, right?

The dentisy of a material on the molecular level will determine how well light travels through it for a similar reason. For instance, diamond (high density carbon) is the molecule created when each carbon atom has 4 others attached to it, forming a matrix. This molecule is SO dense that light has to slow to to 41% of c just to get through it. Light generally slows down when it has to "interact" with bound electrons in a material. Since a high-density substance like diamond has a higher density of electrons, the light slows down quite a bit. Air, having a very small number of electrons comparatively, has an index close to 1. For a better understanding, try looking on the web for refractive index.
 


The statement is referring to the fact that each substance has a different arrangement of molecules, which affects how light passes through it. This is because the size and shape of molecules can determine how they interact with photons (particles of light). For example, a substance with a more tightly packed molecular structure may have a higher optical density and a higher index of refraction, causing light to slow down and bend more when passing through it. On the other hand, a substance with a looser molecular structure may have a lower density and a lower index of refraction, allowing light to pass through more easily without much bending. Therefore, the unique molecular structure of a substance plays a significant role in determining its optical density and ultimately its angle of refraction. Different molecular structures will have different effects on light, which is why we see different angles of refraction in different substances.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top