Understanding Roller Pressure: Effect of Angle on Sheave Force Distribution

  • Thread starter Thread starter barvas11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the distribution of force among rollers on a sheave with a 180° radius. It is established that if the rollers are friction-free and the cable mass is negligible, the tension throughout the cable remains constant, equating to the force applied at each end of the sheave. However, the force acting on each roller may differ due to the angles at which the cables interact with the rollers. Specifically, the vertical and horizontal components of tension must be analyzed for both interior and end rollers to understand the net forces. Ultimately, the angle of the cables significantly influences the force distribution across the rollers.
barvas11
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys,
I have a sheave with 7 rollers spread evenly on 180° radius. There is an equal amount of force on each end of the sheave pulling down.
My question is will the force acting on rollers be the same for all rollers or will it differ depending on the angle?
I have attached the picture for better illustration.
Thanks for your advice
 

Attachments

  • roller calc.PNG
    roller calc.PNG
    8.4 KB · Views: 485
Physics news on Phys.org
barvas11 said:
Hi Guys,
I have a sheave with 7 rollers spread evenly on 180° radius. There is an equal amount of force on each end of the sheave pulling down.
My question is will the force acting on rollers be the same for all rollers or will it differ depending on the angle?
I have attached the picture for better illustration.
Thanks for your advice

Start by assuming that the individual rollers are friction-free and that the cable mass is negligible. If the cable mass is not negligible then the calculation becomes a little bit messier.

Given the above assumptions, the tension throughout the length of the cable must be equal to the amount of force on each end of the sheave. Call this F.

Consider one of the interior rollers (roller 2 through roller 6). Draw a free body diagram. There are three forces on this roller: Tension pulling rightward, tension pulling leftward and the outward support force from the sheave. Since the roller is not moving, these forces must sum to zero.

What angle do the cables make with the horizontal?
What is the vertical component of the tension on the left hand side? Can you write it as a formula involving force F and angle theta?
Repeat for the right hand side? What is the vertical component of tension?
What is the total of these two tensions in the vertical direction?
[For compleness] What is the total of the two tensions in the horizontal direction?

Now consider roller 1 or roller 7. Draw your free body diagram again. Rotate it 90 degrees so that the roller's support is vertical. What angle does the left hand cable make with the horizontal? What angle does the right hand cable make with the horizontal? What is the net vertical component of tension? What about the horizontal?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top