Understanding Rotational Motion: Answers for Jade

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on clarifying the mathematical representation of rotational motion, specifically the derivatives of unit vectors in polar coordinates. The equations d hat{r}/dt=dot{theta} hat{theta} and d hat{theta}/dt=-dot{theta} hat{r} describe how the unit vectors change with respect to time as the angle theta varies. It is emphasized that the unit vector hat{r} depends on both r and theta, and its direction changes as theta increases. A suggestion is made to visualize the concept through a drawing to better understand the changes in the vectors. Understanding these relationships is crucial for grasping rotational motion in mechanics.
Jadenag
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Okay so my mechanics teacher is taking a rather mathematical approach to CM and its really confusing me. Can someone explain to me what this actually means?

d hat{r}/dt=dot{theta} hat{theta} and

d hat{theta}/dt=-dot{theta} hat{r}

I mean I know that anything with a hat on top is a unit vector and i also know that theta dot represents angular speed. Thankyou.

-jade
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Jadenag! :smile:

Jadenag said:
Okay so my mechanics teacher is taking a rather mathematical approach to CM and its really confusing me. Can someone explain to me what this actually means?

{d \hat{r} \over dt}=\dot{\theta} \hat{\theta} and

{d \hat{\theta} \over dt}=-\dot{\theta} \hat{r}

I mean I know that anything with a hat on top is a unit vector and i also know that theta dot represents angular speed. Thankyou.

-jade

Yes, \hat r is the local unit vector in the r direction at some point (r, theta).
We could also write \hat r(r, \theta), since it is a function of r and theta.
However, if theta increases a little bit (by d\theta), that unit vector changes.
To be precise its angle changes by d\theta.

Perhaps you can make a drawing of it and consider which vector represent the change in \hat r?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top