Understanding Sets Defined by Specification

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhizKid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General Sets
PhizKid
Messages
477
Reaction score
2
SETS DEFINED BY SPECIFICATION: Given a set X and a sentence P(x) that is either true or false whenever x is any particular element of X, there is a set whose elements are precisely those x ∈ X for which P(x) is true, denoted by {x ∈ X : P(x)}.

Does this mean that whenever the function P(x) is true, then x is an element of X, and when P(x) is false, then x is not an element of X?

I'm confused because the wording says that "...a sentence P(x) that is either true or false whenever x is any particular element of X..." which leads me to believe that whether P(x) is either true or false, then it is still an element of set X.

Or is it saying that there is a set within X in which P(x) is true, and there is also another set within X in which P(x) is false?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, no, it's neither of these.

The set \{x\in X~\vert~P(x)\} are all the elements of X which satisfy P. So, in particular, we want all elements to lie in X.

Maybe some examples may help you to see the concept:
  • A=\{x\in \mathbb{N}~\vert~x~\text{is even}\}
    This means that we take all the elements of \mathbb{Z} which are even. So the elements of our set A are precisely 0,2,4,6,8,10,12,...
  • B=\{x\in \mathbb{Z}~\vert~x>0\}
    This is the set of all positive integers. The set consists out of 1,2,3,4,...
    Note that x=1/2 also satisfies x>0. But 1/2 does not belong to B because it doesn't satisfy x\in \mathbb{Z}.
  • C=\{x\in \mathbb{Q}~\vert~2x+2=0\}
    This is the set of all rational numbers x such that 2x+2=0. The only number satisfying that is of course -1. And this number is in \mathbb{Q}, so it belongs to C.

Does this clear up some things?
 
In those 3 examples, would A be considered a proper subset of N, B a proper subset of Z, and C a proper subset of Q?
 
PhizKid said:
In those 3 examples, would A be considered a proper subset of N, B a proper subset of Z, and C a proper subset of Q?

Yes. These are all proper subsets.

Another example would be

D=\{x\in \mathbb{N}~\vert~x\geq 0\}

So this set consists of all elements in \mathbb{N} which are larger than 0. Clearly, this is the entire set. So D is not a proper subset in this case.
 
x has to be in the universe of discourse X and pass the truth condition x is an element of P(x).
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top