Understanding Simplification of Arc Length Calculations

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the simplification of arc length calculations, specifically addressing the treatment of Δx^2 in the context of a square root. It clarifies that Δx^2 can be factored out of the radical, allowing for the expression to be simplified to Δx multiplied by the square root of (1 + [f'(x_i^*)]^2). The misunderstanding arose from incorrectly applying the properties of square roots, particularly in not recognizing that terms must be factors to be pulled out. The explanation emphasizes that only factors can be simplified from under a radical, reinforcing the correct mathematical approach. This clarification aids in understanding the process of calculating arc lengths accurately.
Screen
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is probably very simple, but I'm teaching myself arc length via Paul's Online Calculus Notes and there's a simplification on the page:

eq0013MP.gif


I was wondering why the first Δx^2 was simplified to 1? I understand the other Δx^2 came out of the square root.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you're thinking is akin to \sqrt{a^2+b^2} = \sqrt{a^2+1}\ b, which isn't correct. You can only pull something out of a radical if it's a factor. What Paul is doing is this:
\sqrt{\Delta x^2 + [f'(x_i^*)]^2 \Delta x^2} = \sqrt{\Delta x^2(1 + [f'(x_i^*)]^2)}Now because Δx2 is a factor under the radical, you can say
\sqrt{\Delta x^2(1 + [f'(x_i^*)]^2)} = \sqrt{\Delta x^2}\sqrt{1 + [f'(x_i^*)]^2}= \Delta x \sqrt{1 + [f'(x_i^*)]^2}
 
vela said:
What you're thinking is akin to \sqrt{a^2+b^2} = \sqrt{a^2+1}\ b, which isn't correct. You can only pull something out of a radical if it's a factor. What Paul is doing is this:
\sqrt{\Delta x^2 + [f'(x_i^*)]^2 \Delta x^2} = \sqrt{\Delta x^2(1 + [f'(x_i^*)]^2)}Now because Δx2 is a factor under the radical, you can say
\sqrt{\Delta x^2(1 + [f'(x_i^*)]^2)} = \sqrt{\Delta x^2}\sqrt{1 + [f'(x_i^*)]^2}= \Delta x \sqrt{1 + [f'(x_i^*)]^2}

Oh you are completely right, sorry for such a silly question and thank you for explaining.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K