Understanding Special Relativity (beginner questions)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of special relativity, particularly focusing on time dilation, the perception of time for moving observers, and the behavior of light in different reference frames. Participants explore how these concepts interact and how they relate to the observer's perspective.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that special relativity implies observers see others in relative motion as moving slower through time, while also experiencing a perceived fast-forward effect due to light travel time.
  • Others argue that time dilation does not directly describe what an observer sees visually, emphasizing that light propagation time significantly influences perception.
  • One participant questions the understanding of light behavior in relation to moving observers, suggesting that the speed of light remains constant regardless of the observer's motion.
  • Another participant clarifies that while the speed of light is defined as c in all inertial reference frames, the perception of events can vary based on the observer's frame of reference.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between time dilation and light transit time, with some participants attempting to reconcile these concepts in their understanding of special relativity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how time dilation and light propagation interact, with no consensus reached on the implications of these concepts for visual perception. Some participants agree on the constancy of the speed of light, while others remain uncertain about how this relates to perceived time for moving observers.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in understanding arise from the complexity of reconciling time dilation with the transit time of light, as well as the challenge of visual perception versus theoretical definitions in special relativity.

meoryou
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a large interest in physics; however, my only exposure to special relativity has been through a few books and youtube videos. Because of this I still have a few questions about how special relativity fits into reality.

I believe that special relativity says that any observer will see all other observers that are in relative motion to move slower through time. If I see someone moving towards me, then I will see them moving slower through time. But because of the ever shortening distance that their light has to travel to reach me, I will actually see them in fast forward? In the same note, if someone is moving away from you, their time would be slowed by special relativity and by the fact that each light wave has to go farther than the last. So my perceived time of different things is sped up/slowed depending on if the object is heading closer to or farther from me, and all objects in motion then move a few notches slower through time purely based off of their speed relative to me.

Is this how these two features overlap? If the person moving toward you had 2 parallel mirrors with a laser shooting between them, would you calculate that laser as moving faster than the speed of light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

SR effects like time dilation don't really describe what an observer would see with his eyes. Your description of what an observer would see with his eyes is absolutely right; it's dominated by the time taken for the light to propagate.

Time dilation describes how one frame of reference compares with another. You can conceptualize a frame of reference as a grid of rigid rulers, with a clock at every intersection. The clocks are synchronized with one another by exchanging light signals.

For an observer moving at 10% of the speed of light, the effects due to propagation of light are about 10%, whereas the time dilation effect is about 1% (0.1 squared).
 
meoryou said:
I have a large interest in physics; however, my only exposure to special relativity has been through a few books and youtube videos. Because of this I still have a few questions about how special relativity fits into reality.

I believe that special relativity says that any observer will see all other observers that are in relative motion to move slower through time. If I see someone moving towards me, then I will see them moving slower through time. But because of the ever shortening distance that their light has to travel to reach me, I will actually see them in fast forward? In the same note, if someone is moving away from you, their time would be slowed by special relativity and by the fact that each light wave has to go farther than the last. So my perceived time of different things is sped up/slowed depending on if the object is heading closer to or farther from me, and all objects in motion then move a few notches slower through time purely based off of their speed relative to me.
You were doing so well up to this point, I wonder why you went astray in the rest of your post:
meoryou said:
Is this how these two features overlap? If the person moving toward you had 2 parallel mirrors with a laser shooting between them, would you calculate that laser as moving faster than the speed of light?
I'm not even sure what you are describing, but surely you have read that nothing can go faster than the speed of light, haven't you?

Maybe you could draw a picture or explain more precisely what you have in mind.

Also, are the two features that you are concerned about, the Time Dilation and the transit time of light?
 
meoryou said:
Is this how these two features overlap? If the person moving toward you had 2 parallel mirrors with a laser shooting between them, would you calculate that laser as moving faster than the speed of light?

Light moves at speed c in all reference frames, regardless of the relative motion of the light source. Therefore whether the person was moving toward you, away from you or stationary relative to you, you would measure the laser between the mirrors as traveling at c. Time dilation is simply a logical consequence of this fact, so understanding this will help a lot in understanding the rest of special relativity.
 
ghwellsjr said:
You were doing so well up to this point, I wonder why you went astray in the rest of your post:

I'm not even sure what you are describing, but surely you have read that nothing can go faster than the speed of light, haven't you?

Maybe you could draw a picture or explain more precisely what you have in mind.

Also, are the two features that you are concerned about, the Time Dilation and the transit time of light?
Yes, I think I worded that poorly. Bcrowell helped explain it to me by saying that special relativity doesn't show what exactly an observer would see with his eyes.

http://www.zamandayolculuk.com/cetinbal/PU/rel_light_clock_eb_2.jpg

I understand that because I must see the speed of light at value c, and because I see that it must cover an addition horizontal distance when it is in motion, then I must see it tick less often. And this would also affect everything else, as the clock couldn't disagree with the time in the same reference frame.

So then if this clock were in motion toward me, because the transit time of light was shrinking, I would see everything in a slight fast forward. So then I would also see the beam of light in a slight fast forward? To calculate the "real" speed of light I would have to factor out the transit time of the light? I think Bcrowell helped answer this by saying that special relativity describes the universe as how it exists from your reference frame, but other things affect how you actually perceive it.

So when people say that the speed of light is always c, they mean that it always IS c, but the changing transit time of that information can cause it to be perceived at higher or lower values. For a while I was trying to combine the transit time of light with special relativity to say that special relativity sped things up through time that were moving toward you and slowed things down that were moving away. Separating the ideas makes more sense.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We cannot see the speed of light. We cannot observe light traveling. We cannot calculate the "real" speed of light. What we do in Special Relativity is define the propagation of light to be c in any Inertial Reference Frame and we use that definition to synchronize stationary clocks in the IRF with one another by exchanging light signals.

What we can see are the events of the light bounding back and forth between the moving mirrors if we allow a portion of the light to reflect off in our direction. The rate at which we see the reflections arriving at our eyes is not dependent on our selected reference frame or even our definition of how light propagates but how we separate the transit time from the rate at which the light bounces back and forth is dependent on those factors.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K