Understanding Spectra Shifts of Distant Stars

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ezio3.1415
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spectra Stars
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how astronomers determine the temperature and composition of distant stars through spectral analysis, despite the challenges posed by the Doppler effect and cosmic expansion. Spectra shifts occur due to the star's relative velocity, but the characteristic patterns of elements allow for identification even when shifted. Effective temperature is derived using the principles of blackbody radiation and the Stefan-Boltzmann Law, which remain applicable despite spectral shifts. For distant stars, complexities arise due to the universe's expansion, making precise measurements more challenging. Type Ia supernovae serve as standard candles for measuring cosmic distances, highlighting the importance of spectral observation in confirming their classification.
Ezio3.1415
Messages
159
Reaction score
1
We can know about distant stars temperature,its elements etc by observing its spectra... But that star has a velocity related to us... The spectra will be shifted... Then how do we know the correct spectra?
Another ques... Suppose, something emits a X ray... Then will its characteristic will change(gamma or visible light) for observers with relative velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The spectra of elements are very well known. They have very obvious patterns that can be recognised even if they are shifted a little. Just like you can recognise an old friend even if they take a few steps to one side :)
Think of the sodium doublet for example or the Balmer series for Hydrogen.

Your second question - yes.
 
Thank you for your answer...

But how can we know the temperature then?
 
the temperature of a star is generally given as its "effective temperature"

do you know what blackbody radiation is, and the Stefan-Boltzmann Law?
 
I thought that sun's temperature was found out by using the concept of blackbody radiation... But as the spectra shifts we won't get the right temperature... However, stephen boltzman solved that problem I guess... I knew it but didn't came to my head while I was thinking...
 
As the spectrum shifts it maintains it's shape, so when we graph the new spectrum it still looks the same. Plus, since we know where various absorption lines and emission lines should be, we can match them back up with a non-shifted spectrum. And finally, the amount of shift is VERY small and has very little effect on temperature measurements in almost all cases.
 
Ezio: the above explanations cover nearby star temperatures...for distant stars, which your post said was your interest, the situation becomes far more complex due to expansion of the universe.

I'll see if I can get back tomorrow with a synopsis explanation...
 
Naty1 said:
Ezio: the above explanations cover nearby star temperatures...for distant stars, which your post said was your interest, the situation becomes far more complex due to expansion of the universe.

I'll see if I can get back tomorrow with a synopsis explanation...

Can we even measure single star spectrums at a distance where expansion starts to become noticeable?
 
I thought I might have some notes based on postings here by experts...
no such luck...

The question regarding distant stars is above my pay grade' so I'm not going much further. Here are three related articles that might be of interest, but I did not see much of a direct explanation:

Apparently one of the most distant star clusters is about a billion light years distant:
http://news.ucsc.edu/2007/01/1007.html


and one supernova story is told here:
http://www.eso.org/public/news/eso8807/

at about 5 billion light years distant.


There is a list of star topics here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_astronomy_topics#Stars

which I did not investigate...

As I understand it Eddington luminosity [Eddington Limit] sets the maximum
'steady state' energy [brightness] a star can generate...but whether one has ever been observed in such a transient state, for example, I have no idea.

As Clint Eastwood said when not lecturing an empty chair:
"A man has got to understand his limits" via his Dirty Harry character!
 
  • #10
I forgot to mention:

Type 1a supernovas are the 'standard candle' measuring device...like a fixed brightness light bulb from which distances can be determined...

This category of supernovae produces consistent peak luminosity because of the uniform mass of white dwarfs that explode via the accretion mechanism. The stability of this value allows these explosions to be used as standard candles to measure the distance to their host galaxies because the visual magnitude of the supernovae depends primarily on the distance.

I did not read the article but I think an actual spectrum must be observed to insure an observation is in fact a type 1a...


and here are ways astronomers determine large scale distances...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extragalactic_Distance_Scale
 
  • #11
Thank you very much for your answers Naty1 & Drakkith... And special thanks to Naty1 for your links... :)
 

Similar threads

Back
Top