Understanding Static Equilibrium and Beam Forces: A Troubleshooting Guide

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding static equilibrium and the forces acting on a beam, particularly focusing on the calculations and assumptions related to force directions and magnitudes in a static system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the conversion of units from pounds to newtons and questioning the assumptions made about the direction of forces. There are discussions on moment balance equations and the implications of these calculations on determining force components.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing with various interpretations being explored. Some participants are questioning the validity of assumptions regarding force directions, while others are suggesting alternative approaches to moment balance. There is no explicit consensus, but productive dialogue is occurring around the problem setup.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of static equilibrium on force direction and magnitude, as well as the clarity of the problem statement regarding the forces involved.

benny1993
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I have been trying to work on this problem, but I keep getting the answer wrong. I would appreciate if someone could help me understand what I did wrong.
problem 7.png

Below is my answer and solution:
Problem_7.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Solution_7.jpg
    Solution_7.jpg
    120.2 KB · Views: 333
  • Problem_7.jpg
    Problem_7.jpg
    129.8 KB · Views: 317
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How can you work with ft and lb and come up with a force in N ?

What is the direction of Fp ? You seem to think it's horizontal. Why ?
 
It's actually in lbs. I don't know why I wrote 45.2N. The answer is supposed to be in lbs.
And about the direction of F(p), I assumed it would be horizontal since the beam is in static equilibrium while remaining horizontally.
 
Why not just write the moment balance simply as $$(120)(6)=T_y(12)$$
 
Chestermiller said:
Why not just write the moment balance simply as $$(120)(6)=T_y(12)$$
Wouldn't the answer still be the same?
 
benny1993 said:
I assumed it would be horizontal since the beam is in static equilibrium
Assumption is unfounded.
 
BvU said:
Assumption is unfounded.
Then what would be the correct answer?
 
benny1993 said:
Wouldn't the answer still be the same?
Yes, but wouldn’t be simpler? This would also allow you to immediately determine the vertical reaction force component at the pin.
 
But you have the 75 lb right there in your calculations.

The question is what is the magnitude of the force, not what is the horizontal component of the force.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
jack action said:
But you have the 75 lb right there in your calculations.

The question is what is the magnitude of the force, not what is the horizontal component of the force.
Not exactly. The 75lb found in post #1 is for the tension in the cable. However, there is a neat way of seeing that the reaction at the hinge must have the same magnitude.
benny1993 said:
And about the direction of F(p), I assumed it would be horizontal
Easily falsified. Consider moments about the tip of the beam.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller

Similar threads

Replies
43
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K