Understanding Summation Series: Finding Patterns in Sums of Squares

  • Thread starter Thread starter jobsism
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the sum of the series 1^2 + 2^2 + ... + k^2 and highlights the formula k(k+1)(2k+1)/6, which can be proven by induction. Participants express curiosity about identifying patterns in summation series and share resources, including links to articles on discrete calculus and generating functionology. A geometric proof of the series is praised, though questions arise about the applicability of such proofs to more complex series. Recommendations for introductory books, particularly "Proof Without Words" by Roger B. Nelsen, are provided for further exploration of geometric proofs. The conversation emphasizes the beauty and complexity of mathematical proofs and series.
jobsism
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
Sum of 1^2 +2^2 +...k^2

How do you evaluate the sum of the series:-

(1^2) + (2^2)+...(k^2) ?

I do know how to prove that the sum is k(k+1)(2k+1)/6 by induction, but I'm just curious: how do you figure out the pattern for this, and other similar summation series?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


micromass said:
homepages.math.uic.edu/~kauffman/DCalc.pdf

Hey, thanks a lot! This is amazing. (The second link will take more time to digest, of course.)

If you are the author, you may want to fix a typo (I think) at the bottom of page 3, where 12n^{\underline 3} becomes 8n(n-1)(n-2) instead of 12n(n-1)(n-2).
 


Thanks you, micromass and Tobias Funke! :D

I didn't even know that there was a branch of mathematics called generatingfunctionology! I didn't read much of it, but I intend to. The article on Discrete Calculus was more interesting, but it's taking some time to get used to it. Can you suggest some introductory books for it, to gain practice?

That geometric proof was simply marvellous, but such proofs can't exist for more sophisticated series, can it?
 


jobsism said:
That geometric proof was simply marvellous, but such proofs can't exist for more sophisticated series, can it?

There are these series of books out there labeled Proof Without Words by Roger B. Nelsen which are FILLED with similar examples to this type of problem. They don't provide the proof, that's left up to you, but all of the content is viewed geometrically.

I've attached three "proofs"from the book that I thought were interesting.
 

Attachments

  • photo.jpg
    photo.jpg
    20.6 KB · Views: 533
  • photo (2).jpg
    photo (2).jpg
    20.3 KB · Views: 496
  • photo (1).jpg
    photo (1).jpg
    26.6 KB · Views: 527


Those proofs are amazing! Thanks, scurty! I'll check out that book.

The third one reminded me of the Sierpinski fractal. :D
 


this is explained in a footnote on page 27 of courant's calculus.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top