Understanding T^2 x L Graphing for Simple Pendulum Experiment

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around graphing a T^2 versus L relationship for a simple pendulum experiment. Participants are exploring how to accurately represent the period squared (T^2) on the graph, particularly in relation to the length (L) of the pendulum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning how to calculate T^2 from the period (T) values they have recorded. There is uncertainty about whether T^2 is simply the square of the period or if a different approach is required. Some are seeking clarification on plotting coordinates correctly.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing dialogue about the correct method for calculating T^2 and how to represent it on the graph. Some participants have confirmed that squaring the period is the expected approach, while others express confusion and seek further examples or clarification.

Contextual Notes

Participants have noted discrepancies in methods seen on other forums, indicating a lack of consensus on the approach to calculating T^2.

shivam28
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Summary: Question regarding graphing a T^2 x L graph for a simple pendulum

I did a Simple Pendulum experiment in my college physics class the other day. We were asked to graph a T^2 x L graph based off our results. I plan on using the Length on the x-axis and the T^2 on the Y-axis.

This may seem like a simple question but how would I find my T^2? Is it just simply the Period (T) that we timed but squared? For example: T = 1.10s is 1.21 T^2. Or, is there some kind of formula I need to find T^2? Here is a picture of my table that will hopefully clarify:
404F9E2F-6DFD-4BA0-8644-DE0A40AA76B0.jpeg


Based off my picture above, should I plot my first coordinate at (28, 1.10) or (28, 1.21)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need T2 as the ordinate: you expect a linear dependency on T2, not on T.
 
BvU said:
You need T2 as the ordinate: you expect a linear dependency on T2, not on T.

Sorry, I don't believe I understand.
 
BvU said:
You need T2 as the ordinate: you expect a linear dependency on T2, not on T.

So Should I be squaring my T values to get T^2 and use those as the values on my Y-axis?
 
I would plot L (meters) on the x-axis and T^2 (seconds^2) on the y-axis.
 
gmax137 said:
I would plot L (meters) on the x-axis and T^2 (seconds^2) on the y-axis.

Yup, that's what I said I was going to do. I'm only confused on how to get my T^2. Is it just squaring the T value that I already have written down (1.10 to 1.21), or is there an equation for it (I've seen people do it both ways on different forums, with different answers).
 
shivam28 said:
Is it just squaring the T value that I already have written down (1.10 to 1.21)
Yes.
shivam28 said:
I've seen people do it both ways on different forums
Please post an example or link for the 'other' way.
 
shivam28 said:
So Should I be squaring my T values to get T^2 and use those as the values on my Y-axis?
Just DO IT and see what happens. Make y = T2 and plot x against y. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K