Understanding the Born Rule for Continuous Particle Position Measurement"

  • Thread starter Thread starter nomadreid
  • Start date Start date
nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,748
Reaction score
243
If I have the formulation right, the Born rule says that the probability that a measurement for the position of the particle at time t will be in the real interval [a,b] equals ∫ab|ψ(x,t)|2dx. Fine. So, is the probability that a continuous measurement for the position of the particle will be in the real interval [a,b] at least once during the time interval [t1,t2] just equal to ∫t1t2ab|ψ(x,t)|2dx dt, or does this not work? If not, is there a more appropriate calculation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks, bhobba and atyy. Never considered that! Fascinating...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top