Understanding the Complexities of Square Roots in Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter madness
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a paradox involving square roots in equations, specifically the equation (-1)/1=1/(-1). The user attempts to take the square root of both sides, leading to confusion about the validity of the formula sqrt(a/b)=sqrt(a)/sqrt(b). Key points highlight that every non-zero number has two square roots, complicating the application of this formula. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the conditions under which square root properties hold true. Ultimately, the complexities of square roots in equations require careful consideration of their definitions and properties.
madness
Messages
813
Reaction score
69
I have come up with a simple "paradox" (obviously I am doing something wrong). Sorry I can't use latex:

(-1)/1=1/(-1), take square root of both sides, so sqrt((-1)/1)=sqrt(1/(-1))
use sqrt(a/b)=srt(a)/sqrt(b) *, so i/1=1/i, implies i squared =1.

I think the problem is the part marked *, but I'm not sure in what circumstances this is valid. Can anybody help?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The problem is that every number except 0 actually has two square roots with opposite sign. You can arbitrarily choose one for each number, but then the formula sqrt(a/b)=srt(a)/sqrt(b) is not always true (as you demonstrated).

See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_root#Notes"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok that helps a lot. The example on wikipedia was pretty much exactly the one I posted. Thanks.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top