Understanding the concept of Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomtomtom1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concept Energy
AI Thread Summary
Energy is defined as the capacity to do work, calculated as force multiplied by distance, which in this case amounts to 630 Joules for moving a box with a force of 10N over 63 meters. While theoretically, burning 630 Joules of petrol could move the box, practical efficiency means significantly more fuel would be needed due to conversion losses. Work is not solely defined by mass displacement; it can also involve moving charges, compressing gases, or generating heat and light. Thus, while work often relates to displacement, it encompasses a broader range of physical processes. Understanding energy requires recognizing these various contexts beyond just mechanical work.
tomtomtom1
Messages
160
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
Understanding the concept of Energy
Relevant Equations
Understanding the concept of Energy
Hello all

I am trying to better understand the concept of Energy and i was hoping some could help clear a few things up.

I have a car that is pushing a box with a force of 10N.

The car pushes the box 63 meters as shown below:-

joules.JPG
I know that the energy which is the capacity to do work is calculated by the force times the distance, so in this case in would need 630 Joules of energy to move the move with my car.

Given this example would it be correct to say that i will need to burn 630 joules of petrol in order to move this box?
I am trying to connect physical energy such as fire, lighting etc to this number of 630 joules.

Finally, would it be correct to say that in the definition of Energy which is "the capacity to do work", work always relates to a mass being displaced by some distance?

Your thoughts?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tomtomtom1 said:
Given this example would it be correct to say that i will need to burn 630 joules of petrol in order to move this box?
Yes, in principle.
Quantities of petrol are not measured in joules, but the conversison can be made.

The efficiency of such a conversion from chemical energy to pushing force is only of the order of a few dozen percent, though. So in practicce a multiple of fuel equivalent to 630 J is needed.
 
tomtomtom1 said:
work always relates to a mass being displaced by some distance?
No. It might not require any work, or a force, merely to displace the mass by a distance.
It would require work to accelerate the mass, but you could just accelerate it a tiny amount then wait for however long it takes to travel the distance. You might even be able to recover the work invested when bringing the mass to a halt at its destination.
 
  • Like
Likes tomtomtom1
tomtomtom1 said:
work always relates to a mass being displaced by some distance?
work is also involved in moving a charge in a potential field, compressing or expanding a volume of a gas, emitting light, heating, etc. etc.
 
  • Like
Likes tomtomtom1
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top