Understanding the Degeneracy Discriminant in Classical and Quantum Regimes

  • Thread starter Thread starter hokhani
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degeneracy
hokhani
Messages
556
Reaction score
17
The degeneracy discriminant, that specifies the requirement for applicability of classical Maxwell-Blotzman statistics, is z<<1 where z is fugacity and z=exp^(\mu/kT). However when <br /> T\to \infty we would have <br /> z\to 1 which means we are in quantum regime while it is obvious that we are in classical regime at high temperatures. And there is also such a discrepancy when <br /> T\to 0. Could anyone please guide me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top