Understanding the Double-Slit Experiment: Photon Direction and Predictions

  • Thread starter Thread starter glederfein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Double-slit
glederfein
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I have been studying the double-split experiment and read different descriptions of it, but there's something I don't quite understand about the actual setup of the experiment:

In the version of the experiment when photons are fired at the slits one-by-one:
  1. Are the photons fired at random directions?
  2. If I measured the direction in which each photon is fired, would I be able to predict through which slit the photon will pass and therby alter the result?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you use a laser to fire photons in the direction of the left slit you will get no interference
 
glederfein said:
I have been studying the double-split experiment and read different descriptions of it, but there's something I don't quite understand about the actual setup of the experiment:

In the version of the experiment when photons are fired at the slits one-by-one:
  1. Are the photons fired at random directions?
  2. If I measured the direction in which each photon is fired, would I be able to predict through which slit the photon will pass and therby alter the result?

It's possible to collimate the beam so that you can be able to tell which way the photon went, but if you do that the interference pattern is lost. To create an interference pattern the beam must be wide enough (the position must be uncertain enough) that you simply cannot tell which way the photon went. The rule of thumb is: if you can tell which way the photon went (no matter how), than you get no interference pattern. That happens because the localization of the photon makes its momentum (and wavelength) so uncertain that interference cannot happen.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top