Understanding the Double-Well Potential in Protein Electron Transfer

  • Thread starter Thread starter Billyneutron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
AI Thread Summary
A double-well potential in the context of protein electron transfer refers to a structure where two regions of positive electrostatic potential are surrounded by negative potential, facilitating mobile electron transfer. This setup allows for quantum tunneling and superposition, where an electron can exist in both wells simultaneously. The wavefunctions associated with the energy levels of the electron indicate that it can transition between the two wells over time. Consequently, the protein can adopt two different conformations based on the electron's position, reinforcing the concept of superposition. Understanding this mechanism is crucial for elucidating the dynamics of electron transfer in proteins.
Billyneutron
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Could someone articulate what a "double-well" potential is, in this context:

An electrostatic map (of a protein) reveled two regions of positive potential surrounded by negative potential. This structure may provide a local double-well potential for mobile electron transfer within the protein
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks. I'm trying to understand this in the context of quantum tunneling, superposition.

Could you say that the electron can be predicted to occupy both wells, and that this is superposition-- implying that the protein, which can be in one of two confirmations depending on the location of the mobile electron, can also exist in both confirmations simultaneously?

Thanks
 
Billyneutron said:
Could you say that the electron can be predicted to occupy both wells, and that this is superposition-- implying that the protein, which can be in one of two confirmations depending on the location of the mobile electron, can also exist in both confirmations simultaneously?
Yes. I don't know how much quantum you have had, but the simple explanation is that each wavefunction that corresponds to an energy level will occupy both wells. Even if the particle is known to be in one well at some time, after a while it will have a significant probability of being in the other well too.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top