Understanding the Dual of an HO Energy Eigenket

  • Thread starter Thread starter carllacan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dual Energy
carllacan
Messages
272
Reaction score
3
Hi.

This is clearly wrong, but I don't know where is the error:
##\langle n\vert = (\vert n \rangle )^* = (a_+^n\vert 0 \rangle )^* = \langle 0\vert a_{-}^n = 0 ##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The error is in the last step. If ##a_{-}## is the lowering operator, ##a_{-}|0\rangle = 0##, but ##\langle 0 | a_{-} = \langle 1 | \neq 0##. To see this, take the conjugate of the equation ##a_{+}|0\rangle = |1\rangle##.
 
Oh, ok, that explains it. Thank you.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top