Understanding the Exponential Equation 2^(2x+y) = (4^x)(2^y)

  • Thread starter Thread starter PsychStudent
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation 2^(2x+y) = (4^x)(2^y) holds true due to the properties of exponents. By substituting values for x and y, the equivalence can be verified, demonstrating that both sides yield the same result. The discussion highlights the rules of combining exponents, specifically x^a * x^b = x^(a+b) and x^(ab) = (x^a)^b. Understanding these rules clarifies why the initial equation is valid. This foundational knowledge is essential for solving similar exponential equations.
PsychStudent
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Is 22x+y = 4x2y? If I substitute various digits into the x and y variables, it works, but I can't understand why. Can anyone please explain this to me?

For example, if we choose x=3 and y=1,
2(2)(3)+1 = 27 = 128
2(2)(3)+1 = 4321 = 64(2) = 128

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It follows from the basic rules of combining exponents.

x^a x^b = x^{(a+b)}

x^{ab} = (x^a)^b
 
I can't believe I didn't figure that out. Thank you!
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top