Understanding the General Conservation Principle in Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jhenrique
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conservation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the Navier-Stokes equations, which are founded on the conservation of mass, energy, linear momentum, and angular momentum. It proposes a general conservation principle that encompasses all specific conservation laws, suggesting that if the amount of substance is conserved, then charge, mass, energy, and momentum must also be conserved. The conversation highlights that energy and linear momentum conservation arise from spatial and temporal translation symmetries, while angular momentum conservation is linked to rotational symmetries, all under Poincare symmetry. Additionally, it notes that charge conservation is distinct, stemming from gauge invariance. The thread emphasizes the interconnectedness of these conservation laws through underlying symmetries.
Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4
The navier stokes equations are based in 4 presuppositions, the conservation of mass, of energy, of linear momentum and of angular momentum. Also, the KCL too is based in other conservation, the of charge. So I thought: must there is a general conservation that implies all the other particular conservations... this general conservation must be the conservation of the amount of substance (or, in terms more generals, the conservation of every particle that is possible to quantify).
If the amount of substance is conserved, so this implies that the charge and the mass too is, if the mass is conserved so the energy too is, if the energy is conserved so the momentum too is.

What you think about?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to unify the conservation laws it is probably better to think in terms of the symmetries that generate the conservation laws. Energy and linear momentum are conserved due to spatial and temporal translation symmetries, and angular momentum is conserved due to rotational symmetries. So all of those conserved quantities are due to Poincare symmetry. Mass conservation isn't a separate thing from energy and momentum conservation, so you can add that to the list.

Charge, on the other hand, is conserved due to gauge invariance, so that seems to be a separate symmetry.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top